Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 4091–4100
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The testimonial letters praised the Petitioner's skills but did not explain specific contributions of major significance or how her work impacted the field broadly. Opening a yoga studio and implementing teaching methods does not rise to the level of major significance in the overall field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The testimonial letters praised the Petitioner's skills but did not explain specific contributions of major significance or how her work impacted the field broadly. Opening a yoga studio and implementing teaching methods does not rise to the level of major significance in the overall field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-09_02_B2203; source_row=38776 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner did not establish that her article constitutes a 'scholarly article' or that its intended audience was learned persons in the field. Additionally, the Khabar 24 website was not shown to be a professional or major trade publication or other major media.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not establish that her article constitutes a 'scholarly article' or that its intended audience was learned persons in the field. Additionally, the Khabar 24 website was not shown to be a professional or major trade publication or other major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-09_02_B2203; source_row=38775 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Although AAO disagreed with the Director that a proper translation certificate was lacking (one had been submitted), the membership regulations showed that membership is available to any individual paying fees and meeting threshold requirements, not based on outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although AAO disagreed with the Director that a proper translation certificate was lacking (one had been submitted), the membership regulations showed that membership is available to any individual paying fees and meeting threshold requirements, not based on outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-09_02_B2203; source_row=38773 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published materials
Why AAO was not persuaded
Both articles lacked author information, Wikipedia documentation about Khabar 24 was accorded no evidentiary weight, and counsel's assertions about site traffic were unsubstantiated by objective documentary evidence or comparative circulation statistics.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Both articles lacked author information, Wikipedia documentation about Khabar 24 was accorded no evidentiary weight, and counsel's assertions about site traffic were unsubstantiated by objective documentary evidence or comparative circulation statistics.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-09_02_B2203; source_row=38774 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Substantial merit is established, but the Petitioner failed to show his pilot/flight instruction/cargo endeavor would have prospective impact extending beyond his company and clientele to his field, the American aviation industry, or the U.S. economy at a level commensurate with national importance. Claims of addressing pilot shortages and economic multiplier effects were unsupported.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
Substantial merit is established, but the Petitioner failed to show his pilot/flight instruction/cargo endeavor would have prospective impact extending beyond his company and clientele to his field, the American aviation industry, or the U.S. economy at a level commensurate with national importance. Claims of addressing pilot shortages and economic multiplier effects were unsupported.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-09_10_B5203; source_row=38810 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concludes the Petitioner showed only the importance of the aviation industry generally, conflated prong-2 skills with prong-1 endeavor importance, and failed to demonstrate broader prospective impact, job creation, or substantial positive economic effects.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concludes the Petitioner showed only the importance of the aviation industry generally, conflated prong-2 skills with prong-1 endeavor importance, and failed to demonstrate broader prospective impact, job creation, or substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-09_07_B5203; source_row=38797 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner raised the exceptional ability claim for the first time on appeal; because appellate bodies do not consider new claims, these arguments will not be considered. The record supports the Director's conclusion that no exceptional ability criteria were discussed or claimed prior to appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner raised the exceptional ability claim for the first time on appeal; because appellate bodies do not consider new claims, these arguments will not be considered. The record supports the Director's conclusion that no exceptional ability criteria were discussed or claimed prior to appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-09_05_B5203; source_row=38789 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the general industry reports did not address the specific endeavor's prospective national impact, the business plan's revenue and job projections lacked objective evidentiary support, and the Petitioner's claims about economic contributions were speculative.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the general industry reports did not address the specific endeavor's prospective national impact, the business plan's revenue and job projections lacked objective evidentiary support, and the Petitioner's claims about economic contributions were speculative. Operating a financial and tax consultancy for small businesses did not rise to the level of 'substantial positive economic effects' contemplated by Dhanasar.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-09_11_B5203; source_row=38813 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
ten years of full-time experience
Why the evidence was persuasive
Both the Director and the Petitioner agreed this criterion was met; the Petitioner's appeal argument on this criterion was moot because the Director already credited it.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Both the Director and the Petitioner agreed this criterion was met; the Petitioner's appeal argument on this criterion was moot because the Director already credited it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-09_01_B5203; source_row=38764 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c