Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 4131–4140
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Civil / Structural Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO expressly declined to reach the second prong because the first prong failure was dispositive of the appeal.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO expressly declined to reach the second prong because the first prong failure was dispositive of the appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-08_16_B5203; source_row=38756 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner did not show how his consulting business would have broader national-level impact beyond individual clients. The submitted articles addressed the field generally rather than the specific endeavor's prospective national impact.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner did not show how his consulting business would have broader national-level impact beyond individual clients. The submitted articles addressed the field generally rather than the specific endeavor's prospective national impact. The business plan's projections of 10 employees and modest sales figures did not demonstrate substantial positive economic effects at the national level, and the Petitioner's generalized assertions were unsupported by probative evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-08_13_B5203; source_row=38745 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's generalized statements, articles discussing logistics and CFO roles broadly, government reports unrelated to her specific endeavor, an unexplained personal statement conflating field importance with endeavor importance, and two expert letters that similarly conflated field importance with the specific endeavor's importance all failed to show how her CFO role at one consulting company would ha…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's generalized statements, articles discussing logistics and CFO roles broadly, government reports unrelated to her specific endeavor, an unexplained personal statement conflating field importance with endeavor importance, and two expert letters that similarly conflated field importance with the specific endeavor's importance all failed to show how her CFO role at one consulting company would have nationally important broader implications. The unsupported business plan projecting only 13 jobs and $120,905 net profit by year five also failed to demonstrate substantial positive economic effects at a national level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-08_12_B5203; source_row=38741 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The new letter still provided only job title and dates of employment, not duty descriptions, which are required under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1). The recommendation letters on motion addressed only the Petitioner's current role and general demeanor.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The new letter still provided only job title and dates of employment, not duty descriptions, which are required under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1). The recommendation letters on motion addressed only the Petitioner's current role and general demeanor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-08_04_B5203; source_row=38716 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
Well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record does not sufficiently link the Petitioner's educational credential in media arts with general management duties. The new recommendation letters do not detail his prior work history, industry recognition, or significant contributions to management.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The record does not sufficiently link the Petitioner's educational credential in media arts with general management duties. The new recommendation letters do not detail his prior work history, industry recognition, or significant contributions to management.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-08_04_B5203; source_row=38719 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the endeavor
What the decision said
AAO's prior appeal decision focused on national importance (prong 1) and the EB-2 threshold issue; the motion decision does not separately address prong 2 beyond recounting the Director's denial grounds.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO's prior appeal decision focused on national importance (prong 1) and the EB-2 threshold issue; the motion decision does not separately address prong 2 beyond recounting the Director's denial grounds.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-08_02_B5203; source_row=38711 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's finding on appeal, holding the evidence was insufficient to show five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience. On motion, the Petitioner's resubmitted letter was already evaluated on appeal and found deficient; the letter author's objectivity and knowledge of post-departure work history were questioned, and the claims were uncorroborated. Pre-2007 work experience is irrelevant.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding on appeal, holding the evidence was insufficient to show five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience. On motion, the Petitioner's resubmitted letter was already evaluated on appeal and found deficient; the letter author's objectivity and knowledge of post-departure work history were questioned, and the claims were uncorroborated. Pre-2007 work experience is irrelevant.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-08_02_B5203; source_row=38709 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c