Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 4171–4180
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · EB-2 baseline
advanced degree or equivalent qualification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that other documents of record contradict the diploma evaluation's finding that the Petitioner completed a four-year bacharel. The Application for Alien Employment Certification shows she attended the institution for less than four years, and EDGE confirms only four- or five-year bacharels from Brazil equate to a U.S. bachelor's degree.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that other documents of record contradict the diploma evaluation's finding that the Petitioner completed a four-year bacharel. The Application for Alien Employment Certification shows she attended the institution for less than four years, and EDGE confirms only four- or five-year bacharels from Brazil equate to a U.S. bachelor's degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-03_03_B5203; source_row=38640 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO disagreed with the Director's material-change finding and reviewed the full record, but still concluded the Petitioner had not established national importance. Even considering the business plan and supporting documents, the record lacked probative evidence of how the Petitioner's specific consulting work would broadly impact U.S. interests or generate substantial positive economic effects at the national level.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's material-change finding and reviewed the full record, but still concluded the Petitioner had not established national importance. Even considering the business plan and supporting documents, the record lacked probative evidence of how the Petitioner's specific consulting work would broadly impact U.S. interests or generate substantial positive economic effects at the national level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-03_06_B5203; source_row=38654 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's conclusion that the totality of the evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field. The Petitioner's h-index of 8 and low citation counts compared unfavorably to field leaders. AAO rejected arguments that the Director improperly sequenced his analysis or imposed an educational requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's conclusion that the totality of the evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field. The Petitioner's h-index of 8 and low citation counts compared unfavorably to field leaders. AAO rejected arguments that the Director improperly sequenced his analysis or imposed an educational requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-03_01_B2203; source_row=38631 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner provided only generalized information about the hotel industry and the U.S. economy, not specifics about her proposed endeavor. The proposed consulting company would benefit herself and her clients but did not establish broader national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner provided only generalized information about the hotel industry and the U.S. economy, not specifics about her proposed endeavor. The proposed consulting company would benefit herself and her clients but did not establish broader national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-03_04_B5203; source_row=38648 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the motion merely re-argued previously submitted bylaws and that the professional status of the association is not the determining factor; the Petitioner did not show UNITEM requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the motion merely re-argued previously submitted bylaws and that the professional status of the association is not the determining factor; the Petitioner did not show UNITEM requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-03_04_B2203; source_row=38644 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the motion did not contest the identified deficiencies in L-G-'s letter or show legal error, and that the Petitioner failed to provide probative evidence she commands a high salary relative to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the motion did not contest the identified deficiencies in L-G-'s letter or show legal error, and that the Petitioner failed to provide probative evidence she commands a high salary relative to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-03_04_B2203; source_row=38647 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the Petitioner failed to establish that Sprudge qualifies as major media, did not contextualize visitor/viewing statistics, and that self-promotional material from the publisher is not reliable evidence. This finding had been consistently maintained across prior motions.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the Petitioner failed to establish that Sprudge qualifies as major media, did not contextualize visitor/viewing statistics, and that self-promotional material from the publisher is not reliable evidence. This finding had been consistently maintained across prior motions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-03_03_B2203; source_row=38639 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The new letter from the deputy chairperson identifies categories of activities open to members but does not establish that those activities are inherently outstanding achievements, nor that nationally or internationally recognized experts judge applications.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The new letter from the deputy chairperson identifies categories of activities open to members but does not establish that those activities are inherently outstanding achievements, nor that nationally or internationally recognized experts judge applications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-03_02_B2203; source_row=38633 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The new letter from a former Ministry official confirms the certificate has weight within the Ministry but does not establish wider recognition. An award available only within a single employer has little national or international recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The new letter from a former Ministry official confirms the certificate has weight within the Ministry but does not establish wider recognition. An award available only within a single employer has little national or international recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-03_02_B2203; source_row=38632 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIMaster’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach the merits, noting the Director's analysis cited credentials unrelated to the Petitioner's actual filing and therefore failed to meaningfully engage with the evidence.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the merits, noting the Director's analysis cited credentials unrelated to the Petitioner's actual filing and therefore failed to meaningfully engage with the evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-03_07_B5203; source_row=38658 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c