Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 42114220

NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

advanced degree qualification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found the Petitioner's baccalaureate program was completed in approximately two years (entered 2017, completed July 8, 2019), which does not constitute a full four-year baccalaureate degree equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The lato sensu certificate is a professional development credential, not a graduate degree, per the AACRAO EDGE database.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found the Petitioner's baccalaureate program was completed in approximately two years (entered 2017, completed July 8, 2019), which does not constitute a full four-year baccalaureate degree equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree. The lato sensu certificate is a professional development credential, not a graduate degree, per the AACRAO EDGE database.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-01_10_B5203; source_row=38583
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO agreed that while accounting has substantial merit as a profession, the Petitioner's proposed activities represent typical accounting work without demonstrating broader national implications.…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that while accounting has substantial merit as a profession, the Petitioner's proposed activities represent typical accounting work without demonstrating broader national implications. The Petitioner did not show his techniques or innovations were unavailable or superior to those already offered in the U.S., and working as an individual accountant or owning an accounting firm did not rise to the level of substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-01_10_B5203; source_row=38584
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

Substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO partially disagreed with the Director, finding substantial merit established by the size of the sports nutrition industry, but agreed that national importance was not established. The business plan's job creation projections lacked supporting specifics, the public health claims were unsupported by the cited reports, and counsel's assertions were not evidence.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO partially disagreed with the Director, finding substantial merit established by the size of the sports nutrition industry, but agreed that national importance was not established. The business plan's job creation projections lacked supporting specifics, the public health claims were unsupported by the cited reports, and counsel's assertions were not evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-01_12_B5203; source_row=38592
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Electrical / Electronic Engineering

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The supplemental business plan was largely similar to the original and still did not demonstrate broader impact beyond the Petitioner's prospective clients and employees. Revenue and employment projections were neither corroborated nor shown to reach the level of national importance or substantial positive economic effects.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The supplemental business plan was largely similar to the original and still did not demonstrate broader impact beyond the Petitioner's prospective clients and employees. Revenue and employment projections were neither corroborated nor shown to reach the level of national importance or substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-01_05_B5203; source_row=38567
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO declined to reach the second prong because the Petitioner failed to establish national importance under the first prong, making resolution of this prong unnecessary.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the second prong because the Petitioner failed to establish national importance under the first prong, making resolution of this prong unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-01_08_B5203; source_row=38578
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States

What the decision said

AAO declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish national importance under the first prong, making resolution of this prong unnecessary.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish national importance under the first prong, making resolution of this prong unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-01_08_B5203; source_row=38579
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's conclusion, finding that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate prospective national impact. The cooperative's benefits appeared limited to her students and dental offices, her courses were acknowledged to be similar to existing offerings in the United States, and her economic projections were not shown to have broader national or regional implications.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's conclusion, finding that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate prospective national impact. The cooperative's benefits appeared limited to her students and dental offices, her courses were acknowledged to be similar to existing offerings in the United States, and her economic projections were not shown to have broader national or regional implications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-01_08_B5203; source_row=38577
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, waiving the job offer requirement would benefit the United States

What the decision said

Because the first prong was dispositive, the AAO expressly reserved the third prong arguments.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
Because the first prong was dispositive, the AAO expressly reserved the third prong arguments.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-01_07_B5203; source_row=38576
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

Because the first prong was dispositive, the AAO expressly reserved the second prong arguments.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
Because the first prong was dispositive, the AAO expressly reserved the second prong arguments.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-01_07_B5203; source_row=38575
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit (sub-issue of first prong)

What the decision said

Because the Petitioner failed on national importance, the AAO expressly declined to reach and reserved the question of substantial merit.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner failed on national importance, the AAO expressly declined to reach and reserved the question of substantial merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-01_07_B5203; source_row=38574
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
Back to assessment