Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 4351–4360
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high remuneration for services
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO declined to disturb the Director's determination that the Petitioner met the high remuneration criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to disturb the Director's determination that the Petitioner met the high remuneration criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-21_01_B2203; source_row=38341 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to fully reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold number of criteria at step 1. AAO nevertheless noted the record in the aggregate does not support a finding of the required level of extraordinary ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to fully reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold number of criteria at step 1. AAO nevertheless noted the record in the aggregate does not support a finding of the required level of extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-21_02_B2203; source_row=38353 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO reviewed the organizational charter, recommendation and support letters, and published material about the distinguished reputation of [REDACTED], and concluded the Petitioner met this criterion. The Director's decision on this criterion was withdrawn.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reviewed the organizational charter, recommendation and support letters, and published material about the distinguished reputation of [REDACTED], and concluded the Petitioner met this criterion. The Director's decision on this criterion was withdrawn.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-21_02_B2203; source_row=38352 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / ManagementManager
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States
What the decision said
AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish prong one, making resolution of prong three unnecessary.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish prong one, making resolution of prong three unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-21_01_B5203; source_row=38346 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / ManagementManager
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the second prong because the Petitioner failed to establish prong one, making resolution of prong two unnecessary.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the second prong because the Petitioner failed to establish prong one, making resolution of prong two unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-21_01_B5203; source_row=38345 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c