Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 4391–4400
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's evidence—including recommendation letters praising achievements in specific years, a single award received once in 2012, Chilean Football Federation membership, and team roles—did not collectively demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place him among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's evidence—including recommendation letters praising achievements in specific years, a single award received once in 2012, Chilean Football Federation membership, and team roles—did not collectively demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or place him among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-18_01_B2203; source_row=38261 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
intent to continue work in area of extraordinary ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO held that practicing law and teaching at the postsecondary level are distinct areas of expertise requiring different skill sets. The Petitioner had no experience, history, or achievements as a postsecondary teacher, submitted no letters from prospective employers, no prearranged commitments, and no statement detailing plans to teach. None of the submitted evidence related to postsecondary teaching.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that practicing law and teaching at the postsecondary level are distinct areas of expertise requiring different skill sets. The Petitioner had no experience, history, or achievements as a postsecondary teacher, submitted no letters from prospective employers, no prearranged commitments, and no statement detailing plans to teach. None of the submitted evidence related to postsecondary teaching.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-18_02_B2203; source_row=38274 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly reserved the final merits determination under Bagamasbad, finding that the Petitioner's failure to establish intent to continue work in the claimed area of expertise made further analysis unnecessary.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved the final merits determination under Bagamasbad, finding that the Petitioner's failure to establish intent to continue work in the claimed area of expertise made further analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-18_02_B2203; source_row=38273 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner relied on the importance of the trucking industry and entrepreneurship generally rather than demonstrating how his specific endeavor would have broader implications beyond his business and its customers.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner relied on the importance of the trucking industry and entrepreneurship generally rather than demonstrating how his specific endeavor would have broader implications beyond his business and its customers. The revenue and employment projections, even if adequately supported, did not establish operations at a national scale, and the expert letter addressed the industry generally rather than the specific endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-18_07_B5203; source_row=38291 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO incorporated the Director's analysis by reference and noted the Petitioner failed to address the identified deficiencies on appeal. The record also lacked a credential evaluation, official transcripts, and required translation certifications.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO incorporated the Director's analysis by reference and noted the Petitioner failed to address the identified deficiencies on appeal. The record also lacked a credential evaluation, official transcripts, and required translation certifications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-18_03_B5203; source_row=38281 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
advanced degree qualification via five years progressive experience
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's finding that no underlying academic record existed (one was in the record), but agreed that the reference letters collectively fail to demonstrate five years of progressive qualifying experience because they lack specific dates, duty descriptions, and corroborating documentation such as contracts or payment records.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding that no underlying academic record existed (one was in the record), but agreed that the reference letters collectively fail to demonstrate five years of progressive qualifying experience because they lack specific dates, duty descriptions, and corroborating documentation such as contracts or payment records.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-18_10_B5203; source_row=38300 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Civil / Structural Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded the articles describe the importance of the field generally, not the specific endeavor, and the recommendation letters do not specify how the Petitioner's consultancy would have broader implications. As a self-employed consultant she would not employ U.S. workers, and the endeavor does not extend beyond her potential clientele.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the articles describe the importance of the field generally, not the specific endeavor, and the recommendation letters do not specify how the Petitioner's consultancy would have broader implications. As a self-employed consultant she would not employ U.S. workers, and the endeavor does not extend beyond her potential clientele.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-18_11_B5203; source_row=38304 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded the evidence did not establish that the specific endeavor (rather than dentistry or entrepreneurship generally) would have broader implications or substantial positive economic effects. The expert letter focused on Brazil rather than the specific U.S. endeavor, and the business plan's revenue and job-creation projections were unsupported.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the evidence did not establish that the specific endeavor (rather than dentistry or entrepreneurship generally) would have broader implications or substantial positive economic effects. The expert letter focused on Brazil rather than the specific U.S. endeavor, and the business plan's revenue and job-creation projections were unsupported.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-18_01_B5203; source_row=38262 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c