Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 4411–4420
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not offer his patents under the original contributions criterion before the Director; they were presented under the awards criterion or the leading/critical role criterion. New assertions raised for the first time on appeal are not properly before the AAO, so the patent claims were not considered under this criterion.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not offer his patents under the original contributions criterion before the Director; they were presented under the awards criterion or the leading/critical role criterion. New assertions raised for the first time on appeal are not properly before the AAO, so the patent claims were not considered under this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-17_01_B2203; source_row=38210 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that industry-level reports did not illuminate the specific endeavor's prospective impact; the business plan's projections (20 hires, $85M in foreign investment, 280 jobs) lacked objective corroboration; the RIMS II analysis relied on overly broad categories and unverified assumptions; and the proposed company's size and scope were insufficient to reach the level of 'substantial positive economic effects' contempl…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that industry-level reports did not illuminate the specific endeavor's prospective impact; the business plan's projections (20 hires, $85M in foreign investment, 280 jobs) lacked objective corroboration; the RIMS II analysis relied on overly broad categories and unverified assumptions; and the proposed company's size and scope were insufficient to reach the level of 'substantial positive economic effects' contemplated by Dhanasar. Training/knowledge-transfer claims also did not demonstrate broader field impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-17_05_B5203; source_row=38236 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner's proposed teaching endeavor lacked the broader implications required for national importance. Her services did not demonstrate a positive impact on the national economy or the field beyond her prospective students and schools, and new evidence on motion did not cure this deficiency.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's proposed teaching endeavor lacked the broader implications required for national importance. Her services did not demonstrate a positive impact on the national economy or the field beyond her prospective students and schools, and new evidence on motion did not cure this deficiency.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-17_04_B5203; source_row=38233 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the letters described the Petitioner's skills and past work performance but did not establish she had been recognized for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field of her proposed endeavor.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the letters described the Petitioner's skills and past work performance but did not establish she had been recognized for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field of her proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-17_08_B5203; source_row=38250 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Official academic record relating to area of exceptional ability
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO withdrew the Director's determination, finding that the 'title of physiotherapist' constitutes an 'award' from an 'institution of learning' relating to the area of exceptional ability, and qualifies as an official academic record. An advanced degree is not required for this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's determination, finding that the 'title of physiotherapist' constitutes an 'award' from an 'institution of learning' relating to the area of exceptional ability, and qualifies as an official academic record. An advanced degree is not required for this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-17_08_B5203; source_row=38246 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
At least ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding because the Petitioner's statements about her work history were internally inconsistent, the employment letters lacked start/end dates and full-time/part-time specifications, and insufficient corroborating evidence was provided to reconcile the discrepancies.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding because the Petitioner's statements about her work history were internally inconsistent, the employment letters lacked start/end dates and full-time/part-time specifications, and insufficient corroborating evidence was provided to reconcile the discrepancies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-17_08_B5203; source_row=38247 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
license or certification
License to practice the profession or certification for a particular profession or occupation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director because the certification was issued in May 2023, approximately six months after the November 2022 petition filing date, and a petitioner must establish eligibility at the time of filing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director because the certification was issued in May 2023, approximately six months after the November 2022 petition filing date, and a petitioner must establish eligibility at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-17_08_B5203; source_row=38248 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c