Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO found that the Director overlooked a compliant employer letter in the original filing that demonstrated more than six years of qualifying post-baccalaureate experience, establishing the advanced degree equivalency.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Director overlooked a compliant employer letter in the original filing that demonstrated more than six years of qualifying post-baccalaureate experience, establishing the advanced degree equivalency.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-30_07_B5203; source_row=37909 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO did not reach a substantive conclusion on this prong; the Director's finding was vacated because it lacked the required explanation and analysis, and the matter was remanded.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach a substantive conclusion on this prong; the Director's finding was vacated because it lacked the required explanation and analysis, and the matter was remanded.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-30_10_B5203; source_row=37919 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO did not reach a substantive conclusion on this prong; the Director's finding was vacated as the entire NIW analysis lacked the required explanation, and the matter was remanded.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach a substantive conclusion on this prong; the Director's finding was vacated as the entire NIW analysis lacked the required explanation, and the matter was remanded.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-30_10_B5203; source_row=37921 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
official academic record / degree or certificate from institution of learning
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the certificates submitted did not adequately establish that the issuing entities were colleges, universities, schools, or other institutions of learning relating to the area of exceptional ability, and the letters submitted on appeal only attested to employment activities rather than the institutional status of the issuers.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the certificates submitted did not adequately establish that the issuing entities were colleges, universities, schools, or other institutions of learning relating to the area of exceptional ability, and the letters submitted on appeal only attested to employment activities rather than the institutional status of the issuers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-30_11_B5203; source_row=37922 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
at least ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the employer letters lacked specific start and end dates, failed to specify whether employment was full-time, and did not provide detailed job descriptions sufficient to evaluate whether prior experience was in the same occupation as the intended chief executive officer and coach role.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the employer letters lacked specific start and end dates, failed to specify whether employment was full-time, and did not provide detailed job descriptions sufficient to evaluate whether prior experience was in the same occupation as the intended chief executive officer and coach role.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-30_11_B5203; source_row=37923 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
license or certification
license to practice the profession or certification for a particular profession or occupation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner conceded in response to the RFE that there is no formal or legally regulated license or certification in Brazil required to practice capoeira, so this criterion was not demonstrated.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner conceded in response to the RFE that there is no formal or legally regulated license or certification in Brazil required to practice capoeira, so this criterion was not demonstrated.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-30_11_B5203; source_row=37924 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field by peers, governmental entities, or professional or business organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the letters showed the Petitioner to be a competent and valued professional, they did not evidence achievements or significant contributions showing expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the letters showed the Petitioner to be a competent and valued professional, they did not evidence achievements or significant contributions showing expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-30_11_B5203; source_row=37927 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c