Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 4721–4730
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but not national importance. Following the Dhanasar precedent, AAO found the Petitioner failed to show his specific proposed endeavor — IT instruction — would impact the relevant fields broadly enough. Executive orders supporting related policies do not substitute for evidence that the particular endeavor would have broad national implications.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but not national importance. Following the Dhanasar precedent, AAO found the Petitioner failed to show his specific proposed endeavor — IT instruction — would impact the relevant fields broadly enough. Executive orders supporting related policies do not substitute for evidence that the particular endeavor would have broad national implications. Recognition as a top instructor does not materially distinguish the venture from the STEM-teaching proposal in Dhanasar.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-21_03_B5203; source_row=37723 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIMaster’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found it lacks national importance. The record does not show how broadly the platform will reach beyond its direct users, does not demonstrate meaningful employment creation or economic impact, and does not establish that the endeavor is novel or innovative enough to have national or global implications beyond existing industry trends.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found it lacks national importance. The record does not show how broadly the platform will reach beyond its direct users, does not demonstrate meaningful employment creation or economic impact, and does not establish that the endeavor is novel or innovative enough to have national or global implications beyond existing industry trends. AAO also noted a problematic change in the proposed endeavor between the initial filing and the RFE response.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-21_01_B5203; source_row=37716 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's finding that the Petitioner's testimonial letters were too conclusory, his publication record and journal rankings did not demonstrate major significance, his citation comparisons to baseline averages were insufficient, and his patent evidence lacked documentation of widespread commercial or industrial implementation of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's finding that the Petitioner's testimonial letters were too conclusory, his publication record and journal rankings did not demonstrate major significance, his citation comparisons to baseline averages were insufficient, and his patent evidence lacked documentation of widespread commercial or industrial implementation of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-21_01_B2203; source_row=37713 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
While substantial merit is established, the record does not demonstrate national importance because the endeavor's prospective impact does not extend beyond the Petitioner's direct employers and lacks evidence of broader industry, employment, or economic ripple effects.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
While substantial merit is established, the record does not demonstrate national importance because the endeavor's prospective impact does not extend beyond the Petitioner's direct employers and lacks evidence of broader industry, employment, or economic ripple effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-21_06_B5203; source_row=37732 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Regional Board of Administration is a government regulatory agency, not a professional association. Moreover, Law No. 4769 permits registration without a bachelor's degree (via five years of experience), so it does not require members to hold a U.S. baccalaureate or its foreign equivalent.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Regional Board of Administration is a government regulatory agency, not a professional association. Moreover, Law No. 4769 permits registration without a bachelor's degree (via five years of experience), so it does not require members to hold a U.S. baccalaureate or its foreign equivalent.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-21_05_B5203; source_row=37730 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner failed to submit the referenced employer declaration, and the salary survey referenced head of HR salaries while the Petitioner worked as a business analyst or office assistant, providing no proper basis for comparison demonstrating exceptional ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to submit the referenced employer declaration, and the salary survey referenced head of HR salaries while the Petitioner worked as a business analyst or office assistant, providing no proper basis for comparison demonstrating exceptional ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-21_05_B5203; source_row=37729 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Advanced degree or foreign equivalent qualification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's actual degrees are a master and bachelor in customs and international commerce from Venezuela, but no evidence was submitted showing either is a foreign equivalent above a U.S. bachelor's degree. The post-degree employment letter covers only about two years and seven months and lacks job duty descriptions, failing to establish five years of progressive specialty experience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's actual degrees are a master and bachelor in customs and international commerce from Venezuela, but no evidence was submitted showing either is a foreign equivalent above a U.S. bachelor's degree. The post-degree employment letter covers only about two years and seven months and lacks job duty descriptions, failing to establish five years of progressive specialty experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-21_02_B5203; source_row=37719 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
ten years of full-time experience
Why AAO was not persuaded
The employer declarations document approximately 9 years and 2 months of employment across various roles and do not indicate that the work was full-time, falling short of the 10-year full-time requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The employer declarations document approximately 9 years and 2 months of employment across various roles and do not indicate that the work was full-time, falling short of the 10-year full-time requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-21_05_B5203; source_row=37727 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
Why AAO was not persuaded
The lecture declaration did not explain why the Petitioner was selected, the magazine appearance reflected internal company recognition rather than field-wide recognition, and the support letters described general job performance and volunteer work rather than recognized achievements or significant contributions to the HR field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The lecture declaration did not explain why the Petitioner was selected, the magazine appearance reflected internal company recognition rather than field-wide recognition, and the support letters described general job performance and volunteer work rather than recognized achievements or significant contributions to the HR field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-21_05_B5203; source_row=37731 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWlicense or certificationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
license or certification
license or certification
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed that the Petitioner is registered with the Regional Board of Administration of the Federal District as a human resources manager and that registration is required by Brazilian law to practice the profession.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner is registered with the Regional Board of Administration of the Federal District as a human resources manager and that registration is required by Brazilian law to practice the profession.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-21_05_B5203; source_row=37728 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c