Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 4811–4820
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · EB-2 baseline
EB-2 advanced degree qualification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the Brazilian 'Título de Tecnólogo' represents only two to three years of university study and, combined with the Petitioner's own representation of an 'Associate' degree, is not equivalent to a U.S. baccalaureate degree.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Brazilian 'Título de Tecnólogo' represents only two to three years of university study and, combined with the Petitioner's own representation of an 'Associate' degree, is not equivalent to a U.S. baccalaureate degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-14_04_B5203; source_row=37575 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner's business plan projections lacked substantiation, the HUBZone claim was contradicted by public records, the expert opinion letter did not meaningfully address the U.S.-based endeavor, and the Petitioner improperly conflated her personal qualifications with the national importance of her endeavor.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's business plan projections lacked substantiation, the HUBZone claim was contradicted by public records, the expert opinion letter did not meaningfully address the U.S.-based endeavor, and the Petitioner improperly conflated her personal qualifications with the national importance of her endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-14_04_B5203; source_row=37576 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding the record does not demonstrate how the Petitioner is well positioned. A law degree does not clearly support an entrepreneurial sales endeavor. Experience letters do not show similar efforts or a record of success. The business plan is aspirational rather than substantive. Recommendation letters speak to personal character rather than the proposed endeavor.…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding the record does not demonstrate how the Petitioner is well positioned. A law degree does not clearly support an entrepreneurial sales endeavor. Experience letters do not show similar efforts or a record of success. The business plan is aspirational rather than substantive. Recommendation letters speak to personal character rather than the proposed endeavor. The $300,000 in investment letters (one unsigned) falls well short of the $710,000 seed capital described in the business plan, with no explanation of how the gap would be bridged.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-14_07_B5203; source_row=37594 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the credential evaluation combining multiple degrees is not probative — eligibility requires a single foreign equivalent degree. The Petitioner's bachelor's degree is equivalent only to a U.S.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the credential evaluation combining multiple degrees is not probative — eligibility requires a single foreign equivalent degree. The Petitioner's bachelor's degree is equivalent only to a U.S. bachelor's degree, so five years of progressive experience is required, but the work experience documentation contained material inconsistencies (conflicting lease dates and a government document contradicting the claimed 2010 start date) that undermine reliability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-14_07_B5203; source_row=37592 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the endeavor has substantial merit as an entrepreneurial endeavor but found it lacks national importance. The record does not adequately describe how a retail shoe store would broadly implicate supply chain security, employment, or economic effects at a national level. Job creation projections and tax revenue figures are aspirational and not supported by material evidence.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the endeavor has substantial merit as an entrepreneurial endeavor but found it lacks national importance. The record does not adequately describe how a retail shoe store would broadly implicate supply chain security, employment, or economic effects at a national level. Job creation projections and tax revenue figures are aspirational and not supported by material evidence. The HUBZone argument fails because the Petitioner is not a U.S. citizen and cannot qualify for the HUBZone program. The advisory opinion conflicts with the Petitioner's own revenue projections and focuses on past work rather than prospective impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-14_07_B5203; source_row=37593 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO reversed the Director, finding that PBA is an open trade organization whose membership includes practitioners, salons, spas, schools, students, manufacturers, and suppliers, and there was no evidence it requires at least a U.S. baccalaureate degree or its foreign equivalent for membership — a prerequisite for the association to qualify as a 'professional association' under the applicable regulatory definition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reversed the Director, finding that PBA is an open trade organization whose membership includes practitioners, salons, spas, schools, students, manufacturers, and suppliers, and there was no evidence it requires at least a U.S. baccalaureate degree or its foreign equivalent for membership — a prerequisite for the association to qualify as a 'professional association' under the applicable regulatory definition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-14_03_B5203; source_row=37570 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability (D)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the evidence was insufficient because the Petitioner provided no comparable data against which to evaluate her earnings relative to others in the field, failing to show that her remuneration was indicative of exceptional ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the evidence was insufficient because the Petitioner provided no comparable data against which to evaluate her earnings relative to others in the field, failing to show that her remuneration was indicative of exceptional ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-14_03_B5203; source_row=37569 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that general publications about education do not address the Petitioner's specific endeavor or its prospective impact, and the proposed consulting company's training services do not differentiate themselves from existing services or demonstrate national or global implications. The unspecified number of employees in identified job categories also does not show significant potential to employ U.S.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that general publications about education do not address the Petitioner's specific endeavor or its prospective impact, and the proposed consulting company's training services do not differentiate themselves from existing services or demonstrate national or global implications. The unspecified number of employees in identified job categories also does not show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects. AAO reserved on the substantial merit sub-component.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-14_10_B5203; source_row=37602 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach the second prong because the Petitioner failed to establish national importance under the first prong, making a finding on the second prong unnecessary to the result.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the second prong because the Petitioner failed to establish national importance under the first prong, making a finding on the second prong unnecessary to the result.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-14_11_B5203; source_row=37606 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, waiving the job offer requirement would benefit the United States
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish national importance under the first prong, making a finding on the third prong unnecessary to the result.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish national importance under the first prong, making a finding on the third prong unnecessary to the result.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-14_11_B5203; source_row=37607 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c