Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 5041–5050
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Both kgma.kg articles lacked identified authors as required; the second article was about a trauma surgeon without mention of the Petitioner; and the Petitioner provided no evidence that kgma.kg qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major medium. New evidence submitted on appeal was not considered because the Petitioner had been given prior notice and opportunity to submit it.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Both kgma.kg articles lacked identified authors as required; the second article was about a trauma surgeon without mention of the Petitioner; and the Petitioner provided no evidence that kgma.kg qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major medium. New evidence submitted on appeal was not considered because the Petitioner had been given prior notice and opportunity to submit it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-04-25_01_B2203; source_row=37210 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer
What the decision said
AAO found the Director stated the law and relevant considerations but failed to discuss the evidence weighed in performing the balancing analysis, rendering the determination erroneous.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director stated the law and relevant considerations but failed to discuss the evidence weighed in performing the balancing analysis, rendering the determination erroneous.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-04-25_04_B5203; source_row=37228 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's conclusion was unsupported by any analysis of the submitted evidence, and remanded for the Director to properly analyze the evidence under prong one.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's conclusion was unsupported by any analysis of the submitted evidence, and remanded for the Director to properly analyze the evidence under prong one.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-04-25_04_B5203; source_row=37226 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO found the Director failed to analyze the evidence or explain why it was deficient and remanded for full evaluation of all evidence offered for prong two.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director failed to analyze the evidence or explain why it was deficient and remanded for full evaluation of all evidence offered for prong two.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-04-25_04_B5203; source_row=37227 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c