Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 5371–5380
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
High salary or other significantly high remuneration for services
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO declined to accept the salary comparison evidence submitted for the first time on appeal, as the Petitioner was on notice of the requirement, had a reasonable opportunity to submit it earlier, and it was reasonably available. AAO also noted that even if accepted, the evidence would not establish the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to accept the salary comparison evidence submitted for the first time on appeal, as the Petitioner was on notice of the requirement, had a reasonable opportunity to submit it earlier, and it was reasonably available. AAO also noted that even if accepted, the evidence would not establish the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-04-01_01_B2203; source_row=36717 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
Leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's analysis that the Petitioner's work tended to be temporary in nature, his positioning within organizations was unexplained, and the record failed to establish that many of his prior employers had a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's analysis that the Petitioner's work tended to be temporary in nature, his positioning within organizations was unexplained, and the record failed to establish that many of his prior employers had a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-04-01_01_B2203; source_row=36716 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prize or award for excellence
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's analysis, noting the record did not establish specific details about the award including selection criteria, competing candidates, basis for the award, and that no documentary evidence of the award was offered.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's analysis, noting the record did not establish specific details about the award including selection criteria, competing candidates, basis for the award, and that no documentary evidence of the award was offered.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-04-01_01_B2203; source_row=36709 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's proposed work as a pharmacist did not rise to national importance. His statements were general and conclusory, failing to explain how his methodologies would extend beyond his individual employers and customers. The importance of the pharmacy field generally, and the alleged pharmacist shortage, did not establish the national importance of this Petitioner's specific endeavor.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's proposed work as a pharmacist did not rise to national importance. His statements were general and conclusory, failing to explain how his methodologies would extend beyond his individual employers and customers. The importance of the pharmacy field generally, and the alleged pharmacist shortage, did not establish the national importance of this Petitioner's specific endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-04-01_02_B5203; source_row=36723 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's conclusion that national importance was not established, and the second motion to reconsider presented no new legal arguments or identified errors warranting reconsideration.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's conclusion that national importance was not established, and the second motion to reconsider presented no new legal arguments or identified errors warranting reconsideration.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-04-01_01_B5203; source_row=36720 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
Published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's analysis that the publications failed to satisfy criterion (iii) due to lack of source information, focus on authors' own work rather than the Petitioner, and overly generalized content.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's analysis that the publications failed to satisfy criterion (iii) due to lack of source information, focus on authors' own work rather than the Petitioner, and overly generalized content.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-04-01_01_B2203; source_row=36711 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
What the decision said
AAO reserved formal final merits review under Bagamasbad because the step-1 threshold was not met, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not establish the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved formal final merits review under Bagamasbad because the step-1 threshold was not met, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not establish the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-04-01_01_B2203; source_row=36719 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c