Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 5441–5450
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
letters from employer(s) showing at least ten years of full-time experience
Why AAO was not persuaded
Neither employment letter specifies whether the Petitioner was employed full-time, as the regulation requires. Additionally, the record contains inconsistent information, as the Petitioner's CV shows both positions ended years ago while the business plan's copy of the CV states they are ongoing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Neither employment letter specifies whether the Petitioner was employed full-time, as the regulation requires. Additionally, the record contains inconsistent information, as the Petitioner's CV shows both positions ended years ago while the business plan's copy of the CV states they are ongoing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-27_04_B5203; source_row=36618 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
Why AAO was not persuaded
Contributions were limited to one company rather than the industry generally; several articles were promotional/advertising material; the e-book was only shown to be available for purchase; and letters from others recognized the Petitioner's contributions to his customers, not to the industry at large.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Contributions were limited to one company rather than the industry generally; several articles were promotional/advertising material; the e-book was only shown to be available for purchase; and letters from others recognized the Petitioner's contributions to his customers, not to the industry at large.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-27_04_B5203; source_row=36622 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
official academic record showing degree relating to area of exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not explain on appeal how the evidence relates to his area of exceptional ability, and the university transcript shows only 52 of 217 credits completed, not a completed degree.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not explain on appeal how the evidence relates to his area of exceptional ability, and the university transcript shows only 52 of 217 credits completed, not a completed degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-27_04_B5203; source_row=36617 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
license or certification
license to practice the profession or certification for a particular profession or occupation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner submitted the Adobe certificates for the first time on appeal after being put on notice and given a reasonable opportunity to provide evidence, so the AAO declined to consider them.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted the Adobe certificates for the first time on appeal after being put on notice and given a reasonable opportunity to provide evidence, so the AAO declined to consider them.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-27_04_B5203; source_row=36619 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO reserved judgment on the membership criterion because the Petitioner could not fulfill the threshold requirement of three criteria regardless of the outcome on this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved judgment on the membership criterion because the Petitioner could not fulfill the threshold requirement of three criteria regardless of the outcome on this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-27_01_B2203; source_row=36604 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO reserved judgment on the awards criterion because the Petitioner could not fulfill the threshold requirement of three criteria regardless of the outcome on this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved judgment on the awards criterion because the Petitioner could not fulfill the threshold requirement of three criteria regardless of the outcome on this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-27_01_B2203; source_row=36603 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO formally reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but reviewed the record in the aggregate and noted it did not establish the requisite acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO formally reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but reviewed the record in the aggregate and noted it did not establish the requisite acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-27_01_B2203; source_row=36605 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Beneficiary's duties as programmer analyst with the Petitioner matched those of the offered position, making the positions substantially comparable. Under 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(i)(3), an employer cannot rely on experience gained with it in a substantially comparable position to establish minimum qualifications.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary's duties as programmer analyst with the Petitioner matched those of the offered position, making the positions substantially comparable. Under 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(i)(3), an employer cannot rely on experience gained with it in a substantially comparable position to establish minimum qualifications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-27_03_B5203; source_row=36612 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Inconsistencies between the two V-S-P- letters regarding the Beneficiary's position titles and dates of employment, combined with pay slips that were partially illegible and covered only short periods, were insufficient to overcome the credibility concerns raised by the failure to list this experience on the labor certification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Inconsistencies between the two V-S-P- letters regarding the Beneficiary's position titles and dates of employment, combined with pay slips that were partially illegible and covered only short periods, were insufficient to overcome the credibility concerns raised by the failure to list this experience on the labor certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-27_03_B5203; source_row=36615 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c