Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 5471–5480
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
Because the Petitioner failed to establish prong one, the AAO expressly declined to reach and reserved the question of whether the Petitioner is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner failed to establish prong one, the AAO expressly declined to reach and reserved the question of whether the Petitioner is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-22_01_B5203; source_row=36566 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement
What the decision said
Because the Petitioner failed to establish prong one, the AAO expressly declined to reach and reserved the question of whether a waiver would be beneficial to the United States.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner failed to establish prong one, the AAO expressly declined to reach and reserved the question of whether a waiver would be beneficial to the United States.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-22_01_B5203; source_row=36567 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Advanced degree qualification via bachelor's plus five years progressive post-baccalaureate experience
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO reviewed the entire record and concluded the Petitioner did establish by a preponderance of the evidence that he possessed five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience as of the filing date, withdrawing the Director's contrary finding.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reviewed the entire record and concluded the Petitioner did establish by a preponderance of the evidence that he possessed five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience as of the filing date, withdrawing the Director's contrary finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-22_05_B5203; source_row=36578 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the combined employment letters fell short of four years and that the hostess role did not constitute progressive experience in the ice cream manufacturing and sales specialty. The Petitioner's self-employment claim was insufficiently documented—only her own statement, affidavit, and resume were submitted, with overlapping employment dates adding further uncertainty.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the combined employment letters fell short of four years and that the hostess role did not constitute progressive experience in the ice cream manufacturing and sales specialty. The Petitioner's self-employment claim was insufficiently documented—only her own statement, affidavit, and resume were submitted, with overlapping employment dates adding further uncertainty.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-21_03_B5203; source_row=36550 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO concluded the endeavor has substantial merit but does not have national importance: the projected job creation is based on industry standards rather than specifics of this endeavor, the staffing levels are not substantial, and the record does not show the business will impact the physical fitness field more broadly than its direct clients.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the endeavor has substantial merit but does not have national importance: the projected job creation is based on industry standards rather than specifics of this endeavor, the staffing levels are not substantial, and the record does not show the business will impact the physical fitness field more broadly than its direct clients.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-21_05_B5203; source_row=36559 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
Because the Petitioner failed to provide evidence that his department or university has a distinguished reputation, AAO reserved the question of whether he performed in a leading or critical role under Bagamasbad.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner failed to provide evidence that his department or university has a distinguished reputation, AAO reserved the question of whether he performed in a leading or critical role under Bagamasbad.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-21_03_B2203; source_row=36548 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not demonstrate how his cumulative citations or any individual article constitutes an original contribution of major significance. Aggregate citation figures reflect an overall publication record rather than identifying majorly significant research, and all remaining assertions (impact factor, YouTube channel, journal comparisons) were unsubstantiated by documentary evidence.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not demonstrate how his cumulative citations or any individual article constitutes an original contribution of major significance. Aggregate citation figures reflect an overall publication record rather than identifying majorly significant research, and all remaining assertions (impact factor, YouTube channel, journal comparisons) were unsubstantiated by documentary evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-21_03_B2203; source_row=36546 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The article was not about the Petitioner but about a computer model in which he is credited as one of the creators. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to provide evidence that technologyreview.com qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major medium, as no circulation figures or supported audience data were submitted.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The article was not about the Petitioner but about a computer model in which he is credited as one of the creators. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to provide evidence that technologyreview.com qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major medium, as no circulation figures or supported audience data were submitted.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-21_03_B2203; source_row=36544 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c