Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 5571–5580
NIWEB-1A · High remunerationNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
commanded salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
The tax documentation relating to rural property does not show the Petitioner's salary or remuneration for her services demonstrating exceptional ability, as required by the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The tax documentation relating to rural property does not show the Petitioner's salary or remuneration for her services demonstrating exceptional ability, as required by the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-14_10_B5203; source_row=36397 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
FinanceManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate original contributions of major significance, finding that the national planning textbook selection did not itself establish major significance in the field. The record lacked independent expert opinion or other evidence showing the textbooks were recognized as making original contributions of major significance.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate original contributions of major significance, finding that the national planning textbook selection did not itself establish major significance in the field. The record lacked independent expert opinion or other evidence showing the textbooks were recognized as making original contributions of major significance. A recommendation letter submitted on appeal was not considered because the Petitioner had been previously put on notice to provide such evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-14_02_B2203; source_row=36367 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to establish a high salary or significantly high remuneration relative to peers. The comparative wage data was too broad and did not account for her senior role or specific occupation. Her consulting income in mainland China was above average but well below the reported high salary. BLS data was irrelevant because the Petitioner works outside the United States.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to establish a high salary or significantly high remuneration relative to peers. The comparative wage data was too broad and did not account for her senior role or specific occupation. Her consulting income in mainland China was above average but well below the reported high salary. BLS data was irrelevant because the Petitioner works outside the United States.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-14_02_B2203; source_row=36369 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's proposed consultancy did not demonstrate national importance because the record failed to show that her activities would have broader implications beyond her individual clients for the IT or logistics industries as a whole. The relevant question is the impact of the specific proposed endeavor, not the general importance of the human resources profession.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's proposed consultancy did not demonstrate national importance because the record failed to show that her activities would have broader implications beyond her individual clients for the IT or logistics industries as a whole. The relevant question is the impact of the specific proposed endeavor, not the general importance of the human resources profession.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-14_01_B5203; source_row=36363 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's updated statement emphasized his expertise and employer-specific duties without showing broader implications rising to the level of national importance. The government reports had already been considered and resubmitting them does not constitute new facts.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's updated statement emphasized his expertise and employer-specific duties without showing broader implications rising to the level of national importance. The government reports had already been considered and resubmitting them does not constitute new facts. The CRS report argument was misplaced because the Policy Manual's reference to quasi-governmental entities relates to letters of interest, not industry reports.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-14_09_B5203; source_row=36392 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found Petitioner failed to specifically articulate his proposed endeavor beyond a general intent to work in the supply chain industry, and that arguments about industry-wide importance and his personal skills did not establish prospective national impact of the specific endeavor.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found Petitioner failed to specifically articulate his proposed endeavor beyond a general intent to work in the supply chain industry, and that arguments about industry-wide importance and his personal skills did not establish prospective national impact of the specific endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-14_03_B5203; source_row=36374 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherFacultyBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concludes by a preponderance of the evidence that the Petitioner's education, accomplishments, unique background, recognized expertise, planned postdoctoral fellowship, and academic and community funding establish she is well positioned to advance the endeavor.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO concludes by a preponderance of the evidence that the Petitioner's education, accomplishments, unique background, recognized expertise, planned postdoctoral fellowship, and academic and community funding establish she is well positioned to advance the endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-14_08_B5203; source_row=36390 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherFacultyBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concludes that strong positive factors—including Petitioner's advanced degree, achievements, unique skills, and academic and community support, combined with letters explaining why labor certification is ill-suited to identifying such researchers—establish that on balance the United States would benefit from waiving the labor certification.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO concludes that strong positive factors—including Petitioner's advanced degree, achievements, unique skills, and academic and community support, combined with letters explaining why labor certification is ill-suited to identifying such researchers—establish that on balance the United States would benefit from waiving the labor certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-14_08_B5203; source_row=36391 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's statements and business plan offer only generalized descriptions without probative evidence of prospective national-level impact. Plans to hire six employees and knowledge-transfer claims do not show the endeavor will extend beyond the company and its clients to impact the insurance industry or the broader U.S. economy at a nationally important level.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's statements and business plan offer only generalized descriptions without probative evidence of prospective national-level impact. Plans to hire six employees and knowledge-transfer claims do not show the endeavor will extend beyond the company and its clients to impact the insurance industry or the broader U.S. economy at a nationally important level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-14_06_B5203; source_row=36383 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c