Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 5611–5620
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the individual in professional or major media
What the decision said
AAO noted in a footnote that the Director may have made a similar error as with criterion (i) by disregarding competitor-focused published materials, and that the Director's denial of criterion (iii) lacked specificity, but AAO did not resolve this criterion on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted in a footnote that the Director may have made a similar error as with criterion (i) by disregarding competitor-focused published materials, and that the Director's denial of criterion (iii) lacked specificity, but AAO did not resolve this criterion on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-12_01_B2203; source_row=36312 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's proposed accounting activities are typical of the profession and provide individual employer benefit rather than broader national impact. Expert letters were of little probative value as they did not meaningfully address the specific proposed endeavor or its nationwide implications.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's proposed accounting activities are typical of the profession and provide individual employer benefit rather than broader national impact. Expert letters were of little probative value as they did not meaningfully address the specific proposed endeavor or its nationwide implications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-12_02_B5203; source_row=36325 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's proposed activities are typical of a business administrator and he provided no details about unique techniques or methodologies. While individual employers might benefit from his services, the record lacks evidence showing how the endeavor's impact would extend broadly to the national level.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's proposed activities are typical of a business administrator and he provided no details about unique techniques or methodologies. While individual employers might benefit from his services, the record lacks evidence showing how the endeavor's impact would extend broadly to the national level. The expert opinion letter was not persuasive because it did not connect the proposed endeavor to national-level impact and relied on claims inconsistent with the Petitioner's professional plan.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-12_04_B5203; source_row=36331 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
official academic record relating to area of exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Brazilian degree in Human Resources Management does not relate to the petitioner's claimed area of exceptional ability, and the training certificates were not shown to be from an institution of learning or to be official academic records.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Brazilian degree in Human Resources Management does not relate to the petitioner's claimed area of exceptional ability, and the training certificates were not shown to be from an institution of learning or to be official academic records.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-12_05_B5203; source_row=36334 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWlicense or certificationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
license or certification
license or certification for the profession
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that Florida requires a Tattoo Artist License for cosmetic tattooing, permanent make-up, microblading, or micropigmentation, and her license satisfies the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that Florida requires a Tattoo Artist License for cosmetic tattooing, permanent make-up, microblading, or micropigmentation, and her license satisfies the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-12_05_B5203; source_row=36336 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Because the Petitioner did not raise or contest the Director's EB-2 findings on appeal, AAO deemed the issue waived under the principle that an issue not raised on appeal is abandoned.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner did not raise or contest the Director's EB-2 findings on appeal, AAO deemed the issue waived under the principle that an issue not raised on appeal is abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-12_01_B5203; source_row=36317 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c