Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the petitioner's documentation showing broader implications for public health and the engineering field, with results to be widely disseminated, established national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the petitioner's documentation showing broader implications for public health and the engineering field, with results to be widely disseminated, established national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-05_01_B5203; source_row=36218 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner failed to identify which specific criteria do not apply to her occupation or explain why. It was also noted that the Petitioner incorrectly cited comparable evidence criteria for EB-1A extraordinary ability rather than the EB-2 exceptional ability classification she was actually seeking.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to identify which specific criteria do not apply to her occupation or explain why. It was also noted that the Petitioner incorrectly cited comparable evidence criteria for EB-1A extraordinary ability rather than the EB-2 exceptional ability classification she was actually seeking.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-04_01_B5203; source_row=36195 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's own business was small (sole employee) and operated only about nine years without documented media coverage or awards, so it lacked a distinguished reputation. While AAO agreed the major social media company had a distinguished reputation, the Petitioner was not employed by it and the letters from the company did not explain how his contributions mattered to its results or activities.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's own business was small (sole employee) and operated only about nine years without documented media coverage or awards, so it lacked a distinguished reputation. While AAO agreed the major social media company had a distinguished reputation, the Petitioner was not employed by it and the letters from the company did not explain how his contributions mattered to its results or activities.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-04_02_B2203; source_row=36206 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The 2012-2013 commission work involved evaluating business- and tax-related projects, not work in AI, app development, or an allied field. The software product evaluations did not demonstrate judging the work of other software developers; rather, the Petitioner appeared to be selecting which application best suited an organization.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The 2012-2013 commission work involved evaluating business- and tax-related projects, not work in AI, app development, or an allied field. The software product evaluations did not demonstrate judging the work of other software developers; rather, the Petitioner appeared to be selecting which application best suited an organization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-04_02_B2203; source_row=36202 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The two business technology websites ranked 130th and 172nd in online traffic among technology sites in Russia, which does not establish them as major trade publications or major media. The third website, which appeared to be a major medium, lacked documentary proof of publication. The websites also were not shown to be professional publications targeting a professional technology audience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The two business technology websites ranked 130th and 172nd in online traffic among technology sites in Russia, which does not establish them as major trade publications or major media. The third website, which appeared to be a major medium, lacked documentary proof of publication. The websites also were not shown to be professional publications targeting a professional technology audience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-04_02_B2203; source_row=36201 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievement
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the Petitioner documented membership in the engineering organization and an invitation to join the data science community, the record does not establish membership in the other two groups, and none of the four organizations were shown to require outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While the Petitioner documented membership in the engineering organization and an invitation to join the data science community, the record does not establish membership in the other two groups, and none of the four organizations were shown to require outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-04_02_B2203; source_row=36200 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner's comparison was limited to regional wages in an area about 250 miles from Moscow, which does not accurately reflect national averages, and the standard requires comparison to others in the field nationally.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's comparison was limited to regional wages in an area about 250 miles from Moscow, which does not accurately reflect national averages, and the standard requires comparison to others in the field nationally.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-04_02_B2203; source_row=36207 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The IT projects for educational institutions lacked demonstrated importance to the AI/app development field. The social media app copying claims lacked corroborating evidence. The scholarly articles lacked evidence of regular citation or explanation of their significance.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The IT projects for educational institutions lacked demonstrated importance to the AI/app development field. The social media app copying claims lacked corroborating evidence. The scholarly articles lacked evidence of regular citation or explanation of their significance. Most support letters came from clients, business associates, and a former employer rather than independent sources, and none specified the broader significance of contributions to the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-04_02_B2203; source_row=36203 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c