Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 5751–5760
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the Petitioner's rehabilitation clinic has substantial merit, her evidence does not establish broader prospective impact. The business plan's job creation and tax projections lack evidentiary support and do not rise to national importance. Shortage of healthcare professionals addresses substantial merit but not national importance.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Petitioner's rehabilitation clinic has substantial merit, her evidence does not establish broader prospective impact. The business plan's job creation and tax projections lack evidentiary support and do not rise to national importance. Shortage of healthcare professionals addresses substantial merit but not national importance. Expert opinions discuss the importance of the field generally but do not focus on the specific endeavor's broader impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-27_08_B5203; source_row=36099 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but not national importance. The Petitioner's claims about job creation and economic impact were unsupported by a business plan or similar evidence, and the impact of the proposed training center would be limited to enrollees rather than having broader field-wide implications.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but not national importance. The Petitioner's claims about job creation and economic impact were unsupported by a business plan or similar evidence, and the impact of the proposed training center would be limited to enrollees rather than having broader field-wide implications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-27_10_B5203; source_row=36112 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other54 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director that while the Petitioner made original contributions, he did not establish they were of major significance. Citation counts were not shown to be indicative of major significance, letters of recommendation lacked specific impact information, and the Petitioner did not show wide acceptance or implementation of his research.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that while the Petitioner made original contributions, he did not establish they were of major significance. Citation counts were not shown to be indicative of major significance, letters of recommendation lacked specific impact information, and the Petitioner did not show wide acceptance or implementation of his research.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-27_01_B2203; source_row=36069 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although the Petitioner held a leading role for the SQDSAC division, he did not provide sufficient documentation to establish that SQDSAC itself had a distinguished reputation. Being the first company in China on the maglev project did not alone establish distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the Petitioner held a leading role for the SQDSAC division, he did not provide sufficient documentation to establish that SQDSAC itself had a distinguished reputation. Being the first company in China on the maglev project did not alone establish distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-27_01_B2203; source_row=36071 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO affirmed the Director's finding on Dhanasar's first prong and found no basis to reopen or reconsider on motion, as the Petitioner's motion failed to specifically address or rebut AAO's prior determination and offered no new evidence or legal argument.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the Director's finding on Dhanasar's first prong and found no basis to reopen or reconsider on motion, as the Petitioner's motion failed to specifically address or rebut AAO's prior determination and offered no new evidence or legal argument.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-27_01_B5203; source_row=36073 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherEngineer
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
At least ten years of full-time experience
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner failed to list all relevant positions on his Form ETA 750B as required, and that the properly documented positions comprised less than nine years of experience. AAO also noted uncertainty about whether one position was actually 'in the occupation' sought.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner failed to list all relevant positions on his Form ETA 750B as required, and that the properly documented positions comprised less than nine years of experience. AAO also noted uncertainty about whether one position was actually 'in the occupation' sought.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-27_11_B5203; source_row=36116 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Official academic record showing degree or diploma
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed that the diploma and transcript from a federal technological education center constitute official academic records showing a diploma in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the diploma and transcript from a federal technological education center constitute official academic records showing a diploma in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-27_11_B5203; source_row=36115 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the training certificates merely show completion of courses, not achievements; that the bonus and scholarship letters did not establish industry-level contributions; and that the recommendation letters, while praising the Petitioner's capabilities, did not document specific achievements or contributions extending beyond his employers to the larger field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the training certificates merely show completion of courses, not achievements; that the bonus and scholarship letters did not establish industry-level contributions; and that the recommendation letters, while praising the Petitioner's capabilities, did not document specific achievements or contributions extending beyond his employers to the larger field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-27_11_B5203; source_row=36120 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherEngineer
Issue evaluated
license or certification
License to practice the profession or certification for a particular occupation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that neither document was accompanied by evidence that it was required for the Petitioner to work in his occupation in Brazil, and both were obtained in May 2022 after the Petitioner had already entered the U.S. and stopped working as an electrical technician.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that neither document was accompanied by evidence that it was required for the Petitioner to work in his occupation in Brazil, and both were obtained in May 2022 after the Petitioner had already entered the U.S. and stopped working as an electrical technician.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-27_11_B5203; source_row=36117 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c