Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding, concluding the letters lacked the detail required to demonstrate a leading or critical role: they did not describe how the Petitioner's workshops impacted each establishment, and the Petitioner did not appear to hold a leading role in any of the organizations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding, concluding the letters lacked the detail required to demonstrate a leading or critical role: they did not describe how the Petitioner's workshops impacted each establishment, and the Petitioner did not appear to hold a leading role in any of the organizations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-20_01_B2203; source_row=35981 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record lacked evidence that the Speaker of the Year accolades were nationally or internationally recognized: the supporting organization's information did not reference those specific accolades, the website coverage did not establish the site's national or international reputation, and the expert letter addressed a different topic without opining on the national/international recognition of the award.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record lacked evidence that the Speaker of the Year accolades were nationally or internationally recognized: the supporting organization's information did not reference those specific accolades, the website coverage did not establish the site's national or international reputation, and the expert letter addressed a different topic without opining on the national/international recognition of the award.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-20_01_B2203; source_row=35979 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's 2022 salary of $166,161 falls below the 90th percentile nationwide for clinical psychologists ($168,790). The salary data from Indeed (77 reported salaries) was too small a sample to be reliable, and ZipRecruiter data showed top earners in New York earn more than the Petitioner.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's 2022 salary of $166,161 falls below the 90th percentile nationwide for clinical psychologists ($168,790). The salary data from Indeed (77 reported salaries) was too small a sample to be reliable, and ZipRecruiter data showed top earners in New York earn more than the Petitioner. The Petitioner failed to provide geographically and position-appropriate compensation surveys to establish his salary is high relative to others in his specific field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-20_02_B2203; source_row=35986 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found the business plan insufficiently detailed on job creation (no headcount estimates, unclear salary data), that the submitted policy documents showed field-level relevance rather than specific endeavor impact, and that the consulting firm would serve an inherently limited client base without demonstrated broader national implications.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found the business plan insufficiently detailed on job creation (no headcount estimates, unclear salary data), that the submitted policy documents showed field-level relevance rather than specific endeavor impact, and that the consulting firm would serve an inherently limited client base without demonstrated broader national implications. The DOL Schedule A discussion and STEM considerations did not change the analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-20_04_B5203; source_row=36001 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the expert letter addressed the importance of the IT field generally rather than the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor; the recommendation letters spoke to the Petitioner's qualifications rather than the national impact of his proposed company; the industry articles were general background materials; and the business plan's unsupported projections did not demonstrate how the Petitioner's company would i…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the expert letter addressed the importance of the IT field generally rather than the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor; the recommendation letters spoke to the Petitioner's qualifications rather than the national impact of his proposed company; the industry articles were general background materials; and the business plan's unsupported projections did not demonstrate how the Petitioner's company would impact the economy or industry at a national level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-20_02_B5203; source_row=35988 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Director found, and AAO did not disturb, that the Petitioner submitted sufficient evidence to establish participation as a judge of the work of others in the field.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The Director found, and AAO did not disturb, that the Petitioner submitted sufficient evidence to establish participation as a judge of the work of others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-20_02_B2203; source_row=35984 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence — including translated circulation data ranking 52 Bangladeshi newspapers and showing several publications containing articles about him had among the highest national circulation — was sufficient to satisfy the published material criterion at the initial evidence stage.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence — including translated circulation data ranking 52 Bangladeshi newspapers and showing several publications containing articles about him had among the highest national circulation — was sufficient to satisfy the published material criterion at the initial evidence stage. The Director's criticism that no comparative data was provided was not credible given that the document itself ranked 52 newspapers, and the publications were national rather than merely regional.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-20_03_B2203; source_row=35993 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c