Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 5921–5930
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the petitioner
What the decision said
AAO noted in a footnote that the Petitioner did not pursue this criterion on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted in a footnote that the Petitioner did not pursue this criterion on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-08_02_B2203; source_row=35811 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration for services
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that the Petitioner satisfied the high salary criterion. AAO's overall analysis proceeded on the basis that the Petitioner met only this one criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that the Petitioner satisfied the high salary criterion. AAO's overall analysis proceeded on the basis that the Petitioner met only this one criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-08_01_B2203; source_row=35809 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the fact that the employer's cellos sell for $50,000 does not sufficiently demonstrate that the company is marked by eminence, distinction, or excellence, especially without evidence explaining the significance of that price point.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the fact that the employer's cellos sell for $50,000 does not sufficiently demonstrate that the company is marked by eminence, distinction, or excellence, especially without evidence explaining the significance of that price point.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-08_01_B2203; source_row=35808 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly stated it need not conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the initial evidentiary requirements, though it noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly stated it need not conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the initial evidentiary requirements, though it noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-08_01_B2203; source_row=35810 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's proposed research on UAV aerodynamics and applications to civilian industries has substantial merit and, given the emerging critical importance of UAV technology across multiple sectors, rises to the level of national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's proposed research on UAV aerodynamics and applications to civilian industries has substantial merit and, given the emerging critical importance of UAV technology across multiple sectors, rises to the level of national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-08_04_B5203; source_row=35830 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO did not substantively evaluate this prong, noting the Acting Director made contradictory statements both within the denial decision and across the two RFEs, and remanded the matter.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not substantively evaluate this prong, noting the Acting Director made contradictory statements both within the denial decision and across the two RFEs, and remanded the matter.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-08_08_B5203; source_row=35843 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c