Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters praise the Petitioner's skills and abilities but do not specify achievements or significant contributions affecting the aviation industry as a whole. The three new letters on motion detail achievements but fail to explain how those achievements significantly affected the aviation field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters praise the Petitioner's skills and abilities but do not specify achievements or significant contributions affecting the aviation industry as a whole. The three new letters on motion detail achievements but fail to explain how those achievements significantly affected the aviation field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-07_01_B5203; source_row=35784 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the endeavor had substantial merit tied to IT and entrepreneurialism, but found no evidence that it would have an impact beyond the Petitioner's future clients, introduce novel technologies, or contribute to national cybersecurity beyond filling a general professional shortage.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor had substantial merit tied to IT and entrepreneurialism, but found no evidence that it would have an impact beyond the Petitioner's future clients, introduce novel technologies, or contribute to national cybersecurity beyond filling a general professional shortage.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-06_03_B5203; source_row=35776 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination – exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although not required because the initial evidence threshold was not met, AAO conducted an alternative final merits review and found the totality of evidence did not establish expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the IT field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although not required because the initial evidence threshold was not met, AAO conducted an alternative final merits review and found the totality of evidence did not establish expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the IT field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-06_03_B5203; source_row=35774 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner failed to explain why the regulatory criteria do not readily apply to his occupation, which is a prerequisite for USCIS to consider comparable evidence. General assertions are insufficient.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to explain why the regulatory criteria do not readily apply to his occupation, which is a prerequisite for USCIS to consider comparable evidence. General assertions are insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-06_03_B5203; source_row=35773 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AIBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the business plan's staffing projections were internally inconsistent and inflated by double-counting, and lacked supporting citations. General industry reports and background articles did not establish the national importance of the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the business plan's staffing projections were internally inconsistent and inflated by double-counting, and lacked supporting citations. General industry reports and background articles did not establish the national importance of the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor. The company had not advanced beyond the conceptual stage, and the expert letter offered no elaboration on how the Petitioner's work would have broader national impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-06_02_B5203; source_row=35765 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded the Petitioner did not show her managerial work for a warehouse or plant rises to national importance, as it would not extend beyond her prospective employer or have substantial positive economic effects.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the Petitioner did not show her managerial work for a warehouse or plant rises to national importance, as it would not extend beyond her prospective employer or have substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-06_04_B5203; source_row=35779 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
commanding a salary demonstrating exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the Petitioner's earnings exceeded the average software developer salary in Brazil, the evidence did not show how his earnings compared with top earners in the field, did not account for regional differences, and the proper comparator was unclear because employer letters omitted job duties.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While the Petitioner's earnings exceeded the average software developer salary in Brazil, the evidence did not show how his earnings compared with top earners in the field, did not account for regional differences, and the proper comparator was unclear because employer letters omitted job duties.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-06_03_B5203; source_row=35770 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c