Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 6071–6080
NIWprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
Motion to Reopen – New Facts Requirement
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the revised business plan did not present new facts: some additions merely restated facts already in the record, and others introduced new eligibility claims not raised at any prior stage. Additionally, because eligibility must be established at the time of filing, a post-filing business plan revision cannot cure the deficiency.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the revised business plan did not present new facts: some additions merely restated facts already in the record, and others introduced new eligibility claims not raised at any prior stage. Additionally, because eligibility must be established at the time of filing, a post-filing business plan revision cannot cure the deficiency.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-25_04_B5203; source_row=35588 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
USCIS does not accept signatures created electronically or by device on paper-filed forms; a photocopy of a form must contain an original handwritten signature. An electronically reproduced image of a signature lacks the evidentiary force of a personal declaration under penalty of perjury. The Director was permitted to deny (not merely reject) the petition and had no obligation to allow the petitioner to cure the deficiency.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
USCIS does not accept signatures created electronically or by device on paper-filed forms; a photocopy of a form must contain an original handwritten signature. An electronically reproduced image of a signature lacks the evidentiary force of a personal declaration under penalty of perjury. The Director was permitted to deny (not merely reject) the petition and had no obligation to allow the petitioner to cure the deficiency.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-25_02_B5203; source_row=35584 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States
What the decision said
AAO does not reach a substantive determination on this prong, instead remanding because the Director's analysis was conclusory and lacked engagement with the evidence.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO does not reach a substantive determination on this prong, instead remanding because the Director's analysis was conclusory and lacked engagement with the evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-25_10_B5203; source_row=35607 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO notes the Director did not reach a determination on the second prong and does not itself adjudicate the prong, instead remanding for full analysis.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO notes the Director did not reach a determination on the second prong and does not itself adjudicate the prong, instead remanding for full analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-25_10_B5203; source_row=35606 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
AAO does not reach a substantive determination on this prong, instead remanding because the Director's conclusory analysis was insufficient for meaningful review.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO does not reach a substantive determination on this prong, instead remanding because the Director's conclusory analysis was insufficient for meaningful review.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-25_10_B5203; source_row=35605 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Director erred by not concluding the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, given the director's own findings of a bachelor's-equivalent foreign degree plus seven years of full-time employment in the occupation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director erred by not concluding the Petitioner qualifies as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, given the director's own findings of a bachelor's-equivalent foreign degree plus seven years of full-time employment in the occupation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-25_05_B5203; source_row=35590 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States
What the decision said
AAO acknowledged the Petitioner's third-prong arguments on appeal but reserved opinion, citing INS v. Bagamasbad and Matter of L-A-C-, because the Petitioner was ineligible on the first prong.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO acknowledged the Petitioner's third-prong arguments on appeal but reserved opinion, citing INS v. Bagamasbad and Matter of L-A-C-, because the Petitioner was ineligible on the first prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-25_03_B5203; source_row=35587 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record does not show how the Petitioner's specific consulting services would extend beyond his prospective clients to impact the industry or U.S. economy more broadly. The business plan's projections (including $456,822 in taxes, sales growing to $3.7M, and 64 employees over five years) lack sufficient detail and basis.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The record does not show how the Petitioner's specific consulting services would extend beyond his prospective clients to impact the industry or U.S. economy more broadly. The business plan's projections (including $456,822 in taxes, sales growing to $3.7M, and 64 employees over five years) lack sufficient detail and basis. The business is not shown to be in an economically depressed area, and the Petitioner did not establish significant potential to employ U.S. workers or generate substantial positive economic effects at a national level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-25_03_B5203; source_row=35585 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c