Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 6131–6140

NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agrees the endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance. The Petitioner's expertise belongs to prong 2 analysis, the field/industry's importance is not the relevant focus, training activities lack detail and broader impact, and the business plan's projections do not show substantial positive economic effects.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agrees the endeavor has substantial merit but lacks national importance. The Petitioner's expertise belongs to prong 2 analysis, the field/industry's importance is not the relevant focus, training activities lack detail and broader impact, and the business plan's projections do not show substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_08_B5203; source_row=35527
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

labor certification requires individual of exceptional ability

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed the labor certification does not demonstrate the position requires exceptional ability, given the absence of education, training, and experience requirements and the lack of duties indicating exceptional ability.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the labor certification does not demonstrate the position requires exceptional ability, given the absence of education, training, and experience requirements and the lack of duties indicating exceptional ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_09_B5203; source_row=35531
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

labor certification requires advanced degree

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed that because the labor certification's H4 field indicated no minimum education requirement, the position does not require an advanced degree professional.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that because the labor certification's H4 field indicated no minimum education requirement, the position does not require an advanced degree professional.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_09_B5203; source_row=35530
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

What the decision said

AAO declined to reach this criterion because the Petitioner could not numerically satisfy the three-criteria minimum even if this criterion were met, making the analysis unnecessary to the result.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach this criterion because the Petitioner could not numerically satisfy the three-criteria minimum even if this criterion were met, making the analysis unnecessary to the result.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_02_B2203; source_row=35500
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Commercial successReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Commercial success

commercial success in the performing arts

What the decision said

AAO declined to reach this criterion for the same reason as criterion (i): the Petitioner could not numerically meet the three-criteria minimum regardless of the outcome on this criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach this criterion for the same reason as criterion (i): the Petitioner could not numerically meet the three-criteria minimum regardless of the outcome on this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_02_B2203; source_row=35501
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

What the decision said

AAO noted the Petitioner raised this criterion for the first time in his RFE response but did not raise it on appeal, and therefore considered it waived.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO noted the Petitioner raised this criterion for the first time in his RFE response but did not raise it on appeal, and therefore considered it waived.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_02_B2203; source_row=35502
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

Why the evidence was persuasive

The petitioner's CV, academic records, publications, citation record, reference letters describing past successes (including in colon cancer therapeutic strategy), and professional progression at reputed institutions established that they are well positioned to advance the endeavor.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner's CV, academic records, publications, citation record, reference letters describing past successes (including in colon cancer therapeutic strategy), and professional progression at reputed institutions established that they are well positioned to advance the endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_06_B5203; source_row=35521
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer and labor certification

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO found that the petitioner's Ph.D. in medical cell biology, experience, demonstrated potential for widespread medical benefits, and past successes in vascular and colon cancer research showed contributions of such value that, on balance, they would benefit the U.S. even if qualified workers are available.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the petitioner's Ph.D. in medical cell biology, experience, demonstrated potential for widespread medical benefits, and past successes in vascular and colon cancer research showed contributions of such value that, on balance, they would benefit the U.S. even if qualified workers are available.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_06_B5203; source_row=35522
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO found that letters from vascular biology experts, the petitioner's detailed statement, dissemination of results in scientific journals, and involvement of critical and emerging bioinformatics and biomechanical technologies established both substantial merit and national importance.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that letters from vascular biology experts, the petitioner's detailed statement, dissemination of results in scientific journals, and involvement of critical and emerging bioinformatics and biomechanical technologies established both substantial merit and national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_06_B5203; source_row=35520
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

other

Valid signature on Form I-140

Why AAO was not persuaded

USCIS does not accept electronically reproduced or digitally applied signatures; a valid signature must be the petitioner's own personal handwritten mark. The petitioner acknowledged the signature was not original or wet, and the director had discretion to deny rather than reject the petition.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
USCIS does not accept electronically reproduced or digitally applied signatures; a valid signature must be the petitioner's own personal handwritten mark. The petitioner acknowledged the signature was not original or wet, and the director had discretion to deny rather than reject the petition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_03_B5203; source_row=35513
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment