Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 6141–6150

EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the Petitioner provided sufficient evidence of having been a member of the juries for qualifying film festivals, satisfying this criterion, and accordingly withdrew the Director's determination.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner provided sufficient evidence of having been a member of the juries for qualifying film festivals, satisfying this criterion, and accordingly withdrew the Director's determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_01_B2203; source_row=35490
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO declined to disturb the Director's determination that the Petitioner met the display criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to disturb the Director's determination that the Petitioner met the display criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_01_B2203; source_row=35491
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO does not revisit the second prong; the Director's favorable finding stands and is not at issue on appeal.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO does not revisit the second prong; the Director's favorable finding stands and is not at issue on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_01_B5203; source_row=35495
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

recognition for achievements and significant contributions (criterion F)

Why AAO was not persuaded

The letters of recommendation were prepared contemporaneously with the petition proceedings and described the Petitioner's routine business success without establishing expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The letters of recommendation were prepared contemporaneously with the petition proceedings and described the Petitioner's routine business success without establishing expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field. Business metrics cited were not shown to represent significant contributions demonstrating extraordinary expertise, and course completion certificates did not rise to the level of achievements or significant contributions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_02_B5203; source_row=35509
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

membership in professional associations (criterion E)

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO concluded the organizations were not professional associations within the regulatory meaning. The occupation of franchisor does not appear in the list of professions requiring a bachelor's degree, and the record did not establish how the occupation of 'franchisor' relates to the Petitioner's proposed endeavor as an entrepreneur in the food industry.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the organizations were not professional associations within the regulatory meaning. The occupation of franchisor does not appear in the list of professions requiring a bachelor's degree, and the record did not establish how the occupation of 'franchisor' relates to the Petitioner's proposed endeavor as an entrepreneur in the food industry.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_02_B5203; source_row=35508
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

license or certification for profession or occupation (criterion C)

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding the certificates were not persuasive to demonstrate licensure or certification to perform the particular profession or occupation of entrepreneur in the food industry. The certificates did not reflect the competency to perform entrepreneurial duties in the food industry.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding the certificates were not persuasive to demonstrate licensure or certification to perform the particular profession or occupation of entrepreneur in the food industry. The certificates did not reflect the competency to perform entrepreneurial duties in the food industry.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_02_B5203; source_row=35506
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

salary demonstrating exceptional ability (criterion D)

What the decision said

The Petitioner did not assert eligibility or submit evidence under this criterion, so AAO did not address it.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not assert eligibility or submit evidence under this criterion, so AAO did not address it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_02_B5203; source_row=35507
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

ten years full-time experience (criterion B)

Why AAO was not persuaded

The letters were not from current or former employers as required. The business ownership certificates lacked sufficient detail about specific duties and did not establish the field of operation, so AAO could not verify ten years of full-time experience as an entrepreneur in the food industry.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The letters were not from current or former employers as required. The business ownership certificates lacked sufficient detail about specific duties and did not establish the field of operation, so AAO could not verify ten years of full-time experience as an entrepreneur in the food industry.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_02_B5203; source_row=35505
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherFaculty

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

exceptional ability under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)

What the decision said

AAO agreed the record does not readily establish exceptional ability but disagreed with the Director's rationale, finding the RFE notice was defective. The issue was reserved because the Dhanasar analysis is dispositive.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the record does not readily establish exceptional ability but disagreed with the Director's rationale, finding the RFE notice was defective. The issue was reserved because the Dhanasar analysis is dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_07_B5203; source_row=35526
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement

What the decision said

The AAO reserved the third prong as unnecessary to reach given the Petitioner's failure to establish prongs one and two, citing INS v. Bagamasbad.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The AAO reserved the third prong as unnecessary to reach given the Petitioner's failure to establish prongs one and two, citing INS v. Bagamasbad.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-18_05_B5203; source_row=35519
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment