Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 6161–6170
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States
What the decision said
AAO reserved prong three because the first prong was not met, making further analysis unnecessary.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved prong three because the first prong was not met, making further analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-17_03_B5203; source_row=35480 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision, finding the Policy Manual provision cited by the petitioner inapplicable, and confirming that the labor certification's prohibition on alternate occupation experience and the Beneficiary's lack of documented experience in key duties (e.g., conducting time studies) meant the experience requirement was not met.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision, finding the Policy Manual provision cited by the petitioner inapplicable, and confirming that the labor certification's prohibition on alternate occupation experience and the Beneficiary's lack of documented experience in key duties (e.g., conducting time studies) meant the experience requirement was not met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-17_01_B5203; source_row=35474 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the record established the general importance of the IT/cybersecurity industry but not the national importance of the Petitioner's specific proposed work. The evidence did not show the work would have broader implications beyond the employer and clients served, introduce novel technologies, contribute to development of national cybersecurity technologies or next-generation wireless networks, or generate subs…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the record established the general importance of the IT/cybersecurity industry but not the national importance of the Petitioner's specific proposed work. The evidence did not show the work would have broader implications beyond the employer and clients served, introduce novel technologies, contribute to development of national cybersecurity technologies or next-generation wireless networks, or generate substantial positive economic effects at a national level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-16_02_B5203; source_row=35461 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(D))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that 2023-dated financial documents reflecting 2022 income cannot establish eligibility at the time of filing, and Petitioner identified no pre-filing evidence of qualifying remuneration.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that 2023-dated financial documents reflecting 2022 income cannot establish eligibility at the time of filing, and Petitioner identified no pre-filing evidence of qualifying remuneration.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-16_01_B5203; source_row=35454 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
evidence of membership in professional associations
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's finding that criterion E was met because the Petitioner did not provide evidence of the qualifications required for membership in the organization, and therefore its professional nature was not established.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding that criterion E was met because the Petitioner did not provide evidence of the qualifications required for membership in the organization, and therefore its professional nature was not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-16_04_B5203; source_row=35467 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the petitioner in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the article is about her, the record lacks evidence that the publication qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While the article is about her, the record lacks evidence that the publication qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-16_01_B2203; source_row=35450 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO did not address the second prong, noting only that evidence of the Petitioner's skills, knowledge, and prior work relates to the second prong but declining to analyze it given the first-prong deficiency.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not address the second prong, noting only that evidence of the Petitioner's skills, knowledge, and prior work relates to the second prong but declining to analyze it given the first-prong deficiency.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-16_02_B5203; source_row=35462 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c