Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 6171–6180
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
AAO reserved this prong as failure on the underlying EB-2 classification was dispositive.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved this prong as failure on the underlying EB-2 classification was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-16_01_B5203; source_row=35458 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
license or certification
license to practice or certification (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(C))
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the post-filing CDL cannot establish eligibility, and additionally noted the record does not show how a CDL is required to work as an independent business owner in cargo transportation and logistics.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the post-filing CDL cannot establish eligibility, and additionally noted the record does not show how a CDL is required to work as an independent business owner in cargo transportation and logistics.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-16_01_B5203; source_row=35453 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
license or certification
license to practice profession or certification for profession or occupation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner raised criterion C for the first time on appeal, which is procedurally disfavored. He also failed to identify which evidence would be comparable to the licensing criterion or how it would qualify.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner raised criterion C for the first time on appeal, which is procedurally disfavored. He also failed to identify which evidence would be comparable to the licensing criterion or how it would qualify.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-16_04_B5203; source_row=35465 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the equivalency evaluation by A-W- unreliable because (1) the teaching certificate was not titled with Brazilian master's-level credential titles per EDGE, and (2) the baccalaureate transcript showed exemptions for three semesters without explanation, casting doubt on whether the Petitioner completed a four-year program equivalent to a U.S. baccalaureate degree.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the equivalency evaluation by A-W- unreliable because (1) the teaching certificate was not titled with Brazilian master's-level credential titles per EDGE, and (2) the baccalaureate transcript showed exemptions for three semesters without explanation, casting doubt on whether the Petitioner completed a four-year program equivalent to a U.S. baccalaureate degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-12_02_B5203; source_row=35420 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability (D)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO acknowledged the translator certification was in the record but found that the evidence did not show how the Petitioner's earnings compared to others in his field to demonstrate exceptional ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO acknowledged the translator certification was in the record but found that the evidence did not show how the Petitioner's earnings compared to others in his field to demonstrate exceptional ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-12_05_B5203; source_row=35434 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the credential evaluations conclusory and unsupported, and the AACRAO EDGE database confirms a 3-year Titulo de Licenciado is not equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree; combinations of education and experience cannot substitute.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the credential evaluations conclusory and unsupported, and the AACRAO EDGE database confirms a 3-year Titulo de Licenciado is not equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree; combinations of education and experience cannot substitute.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-12_05_B5203; source_row=35432 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO concluded the Petitioner failed to show the endeavor would have broader implications for the solar industry or substantial positive economic effects. Importance of the field itself is not enough; the Petitioner must show his specific endeavor has national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the Petitioner failed to show the endeavor would have broader implications for the solar industry or substantial positive economic effects. Importance of the field itself is not enough; the Petitioner must show his specific endeavor has national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-12_04_B5203; source_row=35429 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Official academic record showing advanced degree or foreign equivalent
Why AAO was not persuaded
The expert evaluation letter was not in accord with the underlying records: the baccalaureate transcript showed unexplained exempt semesters raising doubts about equivalency to a U.S. baccalaureate, and the teaching certificate was not a Brazilian master's degree credential.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The expert evaluation letter was not in accord with the underlying records: the baccalaureate transcript showed unexplained exempt semesters raising doubts about equivalency to a U.S. baccalaureate, and the teaching certificate was not a Brazilian master's degree credential.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-12_01_B5203; source_row=35415 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c