Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 6281–6290
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot established
Case facts
FinancePhysician
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO declined to consider new evidence submitted for the first time on appeal because the Petitioner had prior notice and opportunity to submit it. AAO further found that the comparison of the Petitioner's executive vice president salary to general insurance industry averages was not a proper comparison to others in the same occupation, as required by precedent and case law.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to consider new evidence submitted for the first time on appeal because the Petitioner had prior notice and opportunity to submit it. AAO further found that the comparison of the Petitioner's executive vice president salary to general insurance industry averages was not a proper comparison to others in the same occupation, as required by precedent and case law.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-04_01_B2203; source_row=35249 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the petitioner was not well-positioned: while he had relevant experience as an entrepreneur in Brazil, the evidence did not establish a record of success, the business plan's projections were not adequately supported, funding from personal assets was not documented, and letters from Brazilian clients did not demonstrate progress or interest in the U.S. endeavor.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the petitioner was not well-positioned: while he had relevant experience as an entrepreneur in Brazil, the evidence did not establish a record of success, the business plan's projections were not adequately supported, funding from personal assets was not documented, and letters from Brazilian clients did not demonstrate progress or interest in the U.S. endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-04_07_B5203; source_row=35280 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the endeavor had substantial merit but found the petitioner failed to establish national importance: the business plan's job and revenue projections were not adequately supported, claims about economically distressed location and SBA Hubzone lacked evidentiary support, and broad articles about immigrant entrepreneurs in general did not show prospective impact of the specific endeavor beyond its direct clients.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor had substantial merit but found the petitioner failed to establish national importance: the business plan's job and revenue projections were not adequately supported, claims about economically distressed location and SBA Hubzone lacked evidentiary support, and broad articles about immigrant entrepreneurs in general did not show prospective impact of the specific endeavor beyond its direct clients.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-04_07_B5203; source_row=35279 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed there was substantial merit (potential to improve U.S. business finances and compliance) but found national importance unestablished. The business plan projections ($5.6M revenue, 20 employees after 5 years) were insufficient to show nationally significant economic impact; expert and article evidence addressed the financial field generally rather than the petitioner's specific endeavor; and the HubZone claim lack…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed there was substantial merit (potential to improve U.S. business finances and compliance) but found national importance unestablished. The business plan projections ($5.6M revenue, 20 employees after 5 years) were insufficient to show nationally significant economic impact; expert and article evidence addressed the financial field generally rather than the petitioner's specific endeavor; and the HubZone claim lacked evidentiary support. AAO also rejected the argument that because all businesses need financial auditing, the endeavor is nationally important, distinguishing substantial merit from national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-04_02_B5203; source_row=35264 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The personal statements were unreliable due to suspicious signatures (pixelated or italic-font) inconsistent with the Petitioner's own signature on the Form I-140, and use of Bluebook citation style incongruous with a Brazilian martial arts fitness director. Even if reliable, the statements addressed generalizations about fitness rather than showing how the specific endeavor would have national or global implications.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The personal statements were unreliable due to suspicious signatures (pixelated or italic-font) inconsistent with the Petitioner's own signature on the Form I-140, and use of Bluebook citation style incongruous with a Brazilian martial arts fitness director. Even if reliable, the statements addressed generalizations about fitness rather than showing how the specific endeavor would have national or global implications. The opinion letter bore the same signature concerns. Employer and client letters established only local benefit, not national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-04_04_B5203; source_row=35270 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
high salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found Petitioner failed to compare his compensation to peers in the field, did not justify reliance on comparable evidence, and had previously conceded in his RFE response that this criterion 'will not be met.'
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found Petitioner failed to compare his compensation to peers in the field, did not justify reliance on comparable evidence, and had previously conceded in his RFE response that this criterion 'will not be met.'
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-04_01_B5203; source_row=35257 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor did not rise to the level of national importance, as it was confined to the impact of her company and its clientele, and her revenue and employment projections did not demonstrate substantial positive economic effects for the nation.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor did not rise to the level of national importance, as it was confined to the impact of her company and its clientele, and her revenue and employment projections did not demonstrate substantial positive economic effects for the nation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-04_05_B5203; source_row=35273 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's determination on the first prong unclear—the Director formally found it met but then appeared to question national importance when analyzing the second prong—and reserved the issue because the second prong finding is dispositive.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's determination on the first prong unclear—the Director formally found it met but then appeared to question national importance when analyzing the second prong—and reserved the issue because the second prong finding is dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-01-04_03_B5203; source_row=35267 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c