Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The Petitioner did not submit evidence of an official academic record showing a degree, diploma, certificate, or similar award relating to the area of exceptional ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not submit evidence of an official academic record showing a degree, diploma, certificate, or similar award relating to the area of exceptional ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-19_05_B5203; source_row=35109 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record does not adequately support that the Petitioner's achievements and significant contributions were recognized as significantly above those ordinarily encountered in their industry or field.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record does not adequately support that the Petitioner's achievements and significant contributions were recognized as significantly above those ordinarily encountered in their industry or field. The employer awards covering the top five percent of a worldwide sales force did not clearly represent an achievement of note in real estate development, and the internet browsing room construction project in Venezuela was not clearly connected to or significant in the real estate development field. The remaining letters evidenced competence and reliability but not exceptional achievement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-19_05_B5203; source_row=35114 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Environment / Energy
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
AAO did not reach a substantive conclusion on this prong, instead noting the Director's explanation was insufficient and remanding for proper analysis.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach a substantive conclusion on this prong, instead noting the Director's explanation was insufficient and remanding for proper analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-19_06_B5203; source_row=35119 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Environment / Energy
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO found the Director's decision did not describe the evidence reviewed, did not analyze any evidence submitted, did not list the factors referenced, and did not explain why the evidence was insufficient, depriving the petitioner of a meaningful opportunity to contest the decision.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's decision did not describe the evidence reviewed, did not analyze any evidence submitted, did not list the factors referenced, and did not explain why the evidence was insufficient, depriving the petitioner of a meaningful opportunity to contest the decision.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-19_06_B5203; source_row=35120 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Environment / Energy
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO found the Director committed error by failing to discuss the evidence weighed in the balancing analysis or address the petitioner's specific claims, rendering the determination insufficient.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director committed error by failing to discuss the evidence weighed in the balancing analysis or address the petitioner's specific claims, rendering the determination insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-19_06_B5203; source_row=35121 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
ten years full-time experience
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters from 'work' and 'ex-bosses' covered fewer than five years and lacked sufficient descriptions of duties performed, falling well short of the ten-year requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters from 'work' and 'ex-bosses' covered fewer than five years and lacked sufficient descriptions of duties performed, falling well short of the ten-year requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-19_01_B5203; source_row=35093 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters described the Petitioner's character, work ethic, and positive personal qualities but did not identify any achievements or significant contributions significantly above what is ordinarily encountered in the field. Writers' conclusions alone do not constitute recognition of achievements.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters described the Petitioner's character, work ethic, and positive personal qualities but did not identify any achievements or significant contributions significantly above what is ordinarily encountered in the field. Writers' conclusions alone do not constitute recognition of achievements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-19_01_B5203; source_row=35096 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
license or certification
license or certification to practice the profession
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner submitted an identity card rather than a license or certification, and the card contained an apparent material discrepancy in its issuance dates (July 3, 2014 on the reverse vs. February 2, 2017 on the obverse), calling its reliability and authenticity into question.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted an identity card rather than a license or certification, and the card contained an apparent material discrepancy in its issuance dates (July 3, 2014 on the reverse vs. February 2, 2017 on the obverse), calling its reliability and authenticity into question.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-19_01_B5203; source_row=35094 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c