Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 6421–6430
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · EB-2 baseline
foreign equivalent of U.S. baccalaureate degree
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's three-year Licenciada program does not equate to a four-year U.S. baccalaureate degree per EDGE, and her Diploma de Professor is only equivalent to a U.S. vocational high school diploma. The credential evaluator's opinion was rejected for lack of reasoning, reliance only on diploma and resume without transcripts, and failure to address the EDGE data.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's three-year Licenciada program does not equate to a four-year U.S. baccalaureate degree per EDGE, and her Diploma de Professor is only equivalent to a U.S. vocational high school diploma. The credential evaluator's opinion was rejected for lack of reasoning, reliance only on diploma and resume without transcripts, and failure to address the EDGE data. Contradictions in the record about when she entered the program also prevented determination of program length.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-18_05_B5203; source_row=35076 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the Petitioner conflated the importance of the education industry broadly with the national importance of her specific endeavor. Support letters only showed impact on her immediate professional circle; her proposed programs lacked specificity about format, scale, and scope; and her economic impact claims were not individually quantified.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner conflated the importance of the education industry broadly with the national importance of her specific endeavor. Support letters only showed impact on her immediate professional circle; her proposed programs lacked specificity about format, scale, and scope; and her economic impact claims were not individually quantified.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-18_05_B5203; source_row=35077 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed substantial merit was established but national importance was not. Petitioner's claims about her achievements, the legal industry, and U.S.-Brazil trade were either conclusory or addressed the field generally rather than the specific endeavor; the record did not show the endeavor would impact the legal field or economy at a nationally important scale.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed substantial merit was established but national importance was not. Petitioner's claims about her achievements, the legal industry, and U.S.-Brazil trade were either conclusory or addressed the field generally rather than the specific endeavor; the record did not show the endeavor would impact the legal field or economy at a nationally important scale.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-18_01_B5203; source_row=35067 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalPhD
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concluded that the Petitioner did not consider all evidence submitted, and upon review determined the proposed endeavor has both substantial merit and national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded that the Petitioner did not consider all evidence submitted, and upon review determined the proposed endeavor has both substantial merit and national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-18_03_B5203; source_row=35073 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalPhD
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach prong three, remanding so the Director can conduct a first-line adjudication of whether, on balance, a waiver is beneficial, considering factors such as practicability of a labor certification, U.S. benefit, urgency of national interest, and job creation potential.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach prong three, remanding so the Director can conduct a first-line adjudication of whether, on balance, a waiver is beneficial, considering factors such as practicability of a labor certification, U.S. benefit, urgency of national interest, and job creation potential.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-18_03_B5203; source_row=35075 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Director's earlier RFE determination that the endeavor has both substantial merit and national importance, noting that the Petitioner's research spans multiple high-impact fields and has already had measurable industry impact, including contributions to an open-source project used by well-known U.S. software companies.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director's earlier RFE determination that the endeavor has both substantial merit and national importance, noting that the Petitioner's research spans multiple high-impact fields and has already had measurable industry impact, including contributions to an open-source project used by well-known U.S. software companies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-18_02_B5203; source_row=35070 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner is well positioned, citing his education, publications, citation record, peer review activity, and track record of contributing to successful research projects.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner is well positioned, citing his education, publications, citation record, peer review activity, and track record of contributing to successful research projects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-18_02_B5203; source_row=35071 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c