Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 6511–6520

EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

Assuming arguendo the management activities are original contributions, AAO concludes the Petitioner did not show impact on the business management field as a whole; the cited acquisitions affected only individual companies and industries, the Harvard Business Review award was given to his company rather than him, and recommendation letters did not explain field-wide significance.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
Assuming arguendo the management activities are original contributions, AAO concludes the Petitioner did not show impact on the business management field as a whole; the cited acquisitions affected only individual companies and industries, the Harvard Business Review award was given to his company rather than him, and recommendation letters did not explain field-wide significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-08_01_B2203; source_row=34921
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

Criterion (D) - Salary or remuneration indicative of exceptional ability

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the 2022 compensation could not be considered (petition filed February 2022), and the comparison of gross profit from a sole proprietorship to median wages for truck drivers was improper since the former reflects gross receipts/total business income rather than wages for the occupation.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the 2022 compensation could not be considered (petition filed February 2022), and the comparison of gross profit from a sole proprietorship to median wages for truck drivers was improper since the former reflects gross receipts/total business income rather than wages for the occupation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-08_01_B5203; source_row=34930
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

Occupation qualifies as a 'profession'

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO noted sua sponte that a 'profession' requires a U.S. baccalaureate degree or foreign equivalent as the minimum entry requirement, and the petitioner's occupations of truck driver and owner do not satisfy this definition.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO noted sua sponte that a 'profession' requires a U.S. baccalaureate degree or foreign equivalent as the minimum entry requirement, and the petitioner's occupations of truck driver and owner do not satisfy this definition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-08_01_B5203; source_row=34926
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

Advanced degree or equivalent

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed the Petitioner qualifies for EB-2, but on different grounds: not the MBA certificate (which is a lato sensu certificate not equivalent to a graduate degree), but rather the bachelor's degree in law plus at least five years of progressive experience in the specialty.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner qualifies for EB-2, but on different grounds: not the MBA certificate (which is a lato sensu certificate not equivalent to a graduate degree), but rather the bachelor's degree in law plus at least five years of progressive experience in the specialty.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-08_02_B5203; source_row=34936
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Civil / Structural Engineering

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO noted the Director did not address evidence under prong two and remanded for the Director to determine eligibility under each prong.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO noted the Director did not address evidence under prong two and remanded for the Director to determine eligibility under each prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-08_03_B5203; source_row=34941
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Civil / Structural Engineering

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States

What the decision said

AAO noted the Director did not address evidence under prong three and remanded for the Director to determine eligibility under each prong.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO noted the Director did not address evidence under prong three and remanded for the Director to determine eligibility under each prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-08_03_B5203; source_row=34942
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Civil / Structural Engineering

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

What the decision said

AAO found the Director's first-prong determination unsupported by the record and inadequately explained, noting the Director ignored most evidence and applied heightened standards beyond Dhanasar; AAO did not itself decide the prong but remanded for fresh analysis.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's first-prong determination unsupported by the record and inadequately explained, noting the Director ignored most evidence and applied heightened standards beyond Dhanasar; AAO did not itself decide the prong but remanded for fresh analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-08_03_B5203; source_row=34940
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO reserved analysis of the third prong because failure to meet the first prong was dispositive.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO reserved analysis of the third prong because failure to meet the first prong was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-08_05_B5203; source_row=34949
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO finds the original issues established authenticity and that the materials qualify as professional publications based on their intended audience of entrepreneurs and business managers.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO finds the original issues established authenticity and that the materials qualify as professional publications based on their intended audience of entrepreneurs and business managers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-08_01_B2203; source_row=34920
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO affirms the Director's finding that this criterion is met.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO affirms the Director's finding that this criterion is met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-08_01_B2203; source_row=34922
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment