Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO withdrew the Director's finding. As to I-, the Petitioner's occasional guest lecturing did not establish a leading or critical role for the organization. As to L-, the record lacked contemporaneous documentary evidence of employment or a letter from L- itself, and the letter from an actress lacked sufficient probative value.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding. As to I-, the Petitioner's occasional guest lecturing did not establish a leading or critical role for the organization. As to L-, the record lacked contemporaneous documentary evidence of employment or a letter from L- itself, and the letter from an actress lacked sufficient probative value.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-30_01_B2203; source_row=34763 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The 2006 newspaper articles did not sufficiently show that their circulation levels at the time indicated major media publications, and evidence of 2022 website visits did not remedy this gap. The M-M- internet publication had fewer than 5,000 monthly visits and was not shown to be a qualifying publication.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The 2006 newspaper articles did not sufficiently show that their circulation levels at the time indicated major media publications, and evidence of 2022 website visits did not remedy this gap. The M-M- internet publication had fewer than 5,000 monthly visits and was not shown to be a qualifying publication.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-30_01_B2203; source_row=34760 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record lacked contemporaneous evidence confirming the Petitioner's invitation and participation as a judge. The submitted internet materials about I- made no mention of the examinations. Without additional probative information, AAO could not determine whether judging the event entailed judging work in the Petitioner's field or an allied field.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The record lacked contemporaneous evidence confirming the Petitioner's invitation and participation as a judge. The submitted internet materials about I- made no mention of the examinations. Without additional probative information, AAO could not determine whether judging the event entailed judging work in the Petitioner's field or an allied field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-30_01_B2203; source_row=34761 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
advanced degree or equivalent (five years progressive post-baccalaureate experience)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO calculated approximately 3 years and 8 months of post-baccalaureate work experience from the two employer letters, which falls short of the required five years of progressive experience in sales and marketing needed to qualify as an advanced degree professional.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO calculated approximately 3 years and 8 months of post-baccalaureate work experience from the two employer letters, which falls short of the required five years of progressive experience in sales and marketing needed to qualify as an advanced degree professional.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-30_06_B5203; source_row=34798 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the business plan projections (2–6 employees, modest payroll, limited tax revenues) did not show operations at a nationally important scale. Benefits appeared to be localized to individual client companies rather than having broader national impact. Evidence submitted largely addressed the importance of the consulting industry or profession rather than the specific proposed endeavor.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the business plan projections (2–6 employees, modest payroll, limited tax revenues) did not show operations at a nationally important scale. Benefits appeared to be localized to individual client companies rather than having broader national impact. Evidence submitted largely addressed the importance of the consulting industry or profession rather than the specific proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-30_01_B5203; source_row=34769 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
Both the Director and AAO found that the Petitioner met this criterion. AAO noted the record supports a finding that the Petitioner meets this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO found that the Petitioner met this criterion. AAO noted the record supports a finding that the Petitioner meets this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-30_03_B2203; source_row=34779 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO reserved the final merits determination because step 1 was not met, but noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because step 1 was not met, but noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-30_03_B2203; source_row=34783 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO did not reach the merits of the third prong and directed the Director on remand to consider and evaluate the Petitioner's claims, including those made on appeal.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach the merits of the third prong and directed the Director on remand to consider and evaluate the Petitioner's claims, including those made on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-30_06_B5203; source_row=34801 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c