Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 6621–6630
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Economics
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found no evidence of national importance: the consultancy is a lone business venture with no plan or data showing broader economic impact, job creation, or operation in an economically depressed area.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found no evidence of national importance: the consultancy is a lone business venture with no plan or data showing broader economic impact, job creation, or operation in an economically depressed area.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-29_05_B5203; source_row=34730 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record shows the Petitioner has earned an associate's degree and a certificate related to his claimed area of exceptional ability, satisfying this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record shows the Petitioner has earned an associate's degree and a certificate related to his claimed area of exceptional ability, satisfying this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-29_03_B5203; source_row=34718 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters from colleagues discuss the Petitioner's project successes but do not reference formal recognition of achievements or contributions to the IT industry from peers, government entities, or professional or business organizations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters from colleagues discuss the Petitioner's project successes but do not reference formal recognition of achievements or contributions to the IT industry from peers, government entities, or professional or business organizations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-29_03_B5203; source_row=34723 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
ten years of full-time experience
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that a signed statement by the Petitioner as company owner, corroborated by signed letters from management at client companies attesting to full-time work spanning over ten years, along with invoices and other evidence, satisfied the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that a signed statement by the Petitioner as company owner, corroborated by signed letters from management at client companies attesting to full-time work spanning over ten years, along with invoices and other evidence, satisfied the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-29_03_B5203; source_row=34719 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the purported signatures on the 'proposed endeavor statement' and 'updated personal statement' appeared to be pixelated, copied images, casting doubt on the reliability and sufficiency of those documents and the record overall.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the purported signatures on the 'proposed endeavor statement' and 'updated personal statement' appeared to be pixelated, copied images, casting doubt on the reliability and sufficiency of those documents and the record overall. Even apart from the reliability concerns, the generalized hotel industry statistics were immaterial because they did not discuss the specific proposed endeavor, and the record lacked concrete evidence of operational plans (location, employees, wages) that could demonstrate broader national implications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-29_06_B5203; source_row=34733 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found descriptions of selection criteria too nebulous and that merely repeating regulatory language does not satisfy the burden of proof. The evidence did not show how the Petitioner's specific achievements were considered or determined to be outstanding.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found descriptions of selection criteria too nebulous and that merely repeating regulatory language does not satisfy the burden of proof. The evidence did not show how the Petitioner's specific achievements were considered or determined to be outstanding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-29_01_B2203; source_row=34710 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
What the decision said
The Director did not discuss either the substantial merit or the national importance of the Petitioner's actual endeavor to provide legal consultancy services; remand is required for proper analysis.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The Director did not discuss either the substantial merit or the national importance of the Petitioner's actual endeavor to provide legal consultancy services; remand is required for proper analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-29_04_B5203; source_row=34727 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c