Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 6751–6760

NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Civil / Structural Engineering

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO reserves the second prong as unnecessary given the failure on prong 1.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO reserves the second prong as unnecessary given the failure on prong 1.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-17_02_B5203; source_row=34549
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the individual in professional or major trade publications or other major media

What the decision said

The Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusion regarding published material and provided no additional evidence on appeal; AAO therefore considered this criterion waived.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusion regarding published material and provided no additional evidence on appeal; AAO therefore considered this criterion waived.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-17_01_B2203; source_row=34532
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

What the decision said

AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidence threshold, but noted in the alternative that the record does not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidence threshold, but noted in the alternative that the record does not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-17_01_B2203; source_row=34536
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / ManagementManager

Issue evaluated

ten years experience

Ten years of full-time experience from employer letters

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner's initial employer letter covered less than 10 years. The supplemental letter from a prior employer covered work as an executive secretary, not an HR generalist role. The letter from a purported former co-worker was written on a different employer's letterhead and constituted at best secondary evidence, for which no showing of unavailability of primary evidence was made.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's initial employer letter covered less than 10 years. The supplemental letter from a prior employer covered work as an executive secretary, not an HR generalist role. The letter from a purported former co-worker was written on a different employer's letterhead and constituted at best secondary evidence, for which no showing of unavailability of primary evidence was made.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-17_07_B5203; source_row=34561
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / ManagementManager

Issue evaluated

license or certification

License to practice the profession or certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The professional identity card reflects registration as a manager in tourism administration, not licensure or certification in the HR profession. It does not relate to any particular profession or occupation relevant to HR generalist duties, and the record does not describe what competency standards it reflects.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The professional identity card reflects registration as a manager in tourism administration, not licensure or certification in the HR profession. It does not relate to any particular profession or occupation relevant to HR generalist duties, and the record does not describe what competency standards it reflects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-17_07_B5203; source_row=34562
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWacademic recordEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / ManagementManager

Issue evaluated

academic record

Academic record (degree/diploma/certificate)

Why the evidence was persuasive

Both the Director and AAO agreed the Petitioner demonstrated the academic record criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Both the Director and AAO agreed the Petitioner demonstrated the academic record criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-17_07_B5203; source_row=34560
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWEB-1A · MembershipNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in professional associations

What the decision said

The petitioner did not submit evidence of membership in professional associations.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not submit evidence of membership in professional associations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-17_09_B5203; source_row=34574
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

ten years experience

ten years full-time employer experience

Why AAO was not persuaded

The experience letters were either not from employers or failed to describe full-time duties adequately; the earliest letters only covered from 2015, less than 10 years before filing.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The experience letters were either not from employers or failed to describe full-time duties adequately; the earliest letters only covered from 2015, less than 10 years before filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-17_09_B5203; source_row=34571
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

license or certification

license or certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner submitted an identity card from the Regional Council of Administration, which AAO found was not a license or certification and did not correspond to the proposed occupation of entrepreneur in a personal grooming business.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner submitted an identity card from the Regional Council of Administration, which AAO found was not a license or certification and did not correspond to the proposed occupation of entrepreneur in a personal grooming business.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-17_09_B5203; source_row=34572
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWrecognitionNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

recognition

recognition for achievements and significant contributions

Why AAO was not persuaded

Recommendation letters failed to specify what the petitioner actually did to generate claimed benefits, making it impossible to evaluate whether contributions reflected expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field. Vocational certificates did not demonstrate achievements above the ordinary.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Recommendation letters failed to specify what the petitioner actually did to generate claimed benefits, making it impossible to evaluate whether contributions reflected expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field. Vocational certificates did not demonstrate achievements above the ordinary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-17_09_B5203; source_row=34575
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment