Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 6791–6800

EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance in the field

Why AAO was not persuaded

Reference letters lacked specifics and used hyperbolic language. Claims of being the first to teach children flamenco in Kazakhstan related to teaching rather than choreography, and the fusion dance form was not shown to be sufficiently original or to have had a major impact beyond the Petitioner's direct students and clients.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
Reference letters lacked specifics and used hyperbolic language. Claims of being the first to teach children flamenco in Kazakhstan related to teaching rather than choreography, and the fusion dance form was not shown to be sufficiently original or to have had a major impact beyond the Petitioner's direct students and clients.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-16_02_B2203; source_row=34498
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer and labor certification

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found the Petitioner's track record of successful research and the significance of his cell and gene therapy work would benefit the United States on balance, even assuming qualified U.S. workers are available.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's track record of successful research and the significance of his cell and gene therapy work would benefit the United States on balance, even assuming qualified U.S. workers are available.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-16_09_B5203; source_row=34530
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor to conduct research and develop cell and gene therapies has substantial merit and national importance.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor to conduct research and develop cell and gene therapies has substantial merit and national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-16_09_B5203; source_row=34528
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO concluded the Petitioner's experience, expertise, published articles, frequent independent citations, record of successful research contributions, and expert reference letters demonstrate he is well positioned to advance his endeavor.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the Petitioner's experience, expertise, published articles, frequent independent citations, record of successful research contributions, and expert reference letters demonstrate he is well positioned to advance his endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-16_09_B5203; source_row=34529
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the general real estate industry publications and opinion letters addressed the field rather than the petitioner's specific endeavor. The opinion letters' claims about affordable housing were unsubstantiated given that the business model of remodeling foreclosed properties and reselling them at market prices would likely increase rather than decrease costs.…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the general real estate industry publications and opinion letters addressed the field rather than the petitioner's specific endeavor. The opinion letters' claims about affordable housing were unsubstantiated given that the business model of remodeling foreclosed properties and reselling them at market prices would likely increase rather than decrease costs. Neither the real estate nor the digital device repair franchise aspects of the endeavor demonstrated national or global implications, improved processes, or significant employment or economic effects rising to the level contemplated by Dhanasar.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-16_02_B5203; source_row=34502
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the Petitioner failed to show his consultancy would have broader national impact beyond his own employees and clients. The business plan's projections of eleven jobs and modest revenue were unsupported by credible evidence, and the expert and reference letters did not address how the endeavor specifically rises to national importance.…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner failed to show his consultancy would have broader national impact beyond his own employees and clients. The business plan's projections of eleven jobs and modest revenue were unsupported by credible evidence, and the expert and reference letters did not address how the endeavor specifically rises to national importance. Teaching and speaking activities were similarly found insufficient to establish national importance under Dhanasar.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_07_B5203; source_row=34479
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed the Petitioner demonstrated substantial merit but found he failed to establish national importance. His proposed endeavor was overly broad with wide-ranging but vague and undocumented claims of national impact. Business projections (14 employees, ~$646K revenue) were modest relative to the industries he claimed to impact. Expert opinions lacked corroboration for their general conclusions.…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner demonstrated substantial merit but found he failed to establish national importance. His proposed endeavor was overly broad with wide-ranging but vague and undocumented claims of national impact. Business projections (14 employees, ~$646K revenue) were modest relative to the industries he claimed to impact. Expert opinions lacked corroboration for their general conclusions. The STEM-field argument was also unsupported as the Petitioner failed to explain how his work would help the U.S. maintain competitive or strategic advantages.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_01_B5203; source_row=34446
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien in professional or major media

Why AAO was not persuaded

While some articles appeared in qualifying major media, the submitted materials were deficient because: translations lacked required certifications; none of the articles had author credits as required; some articles were falsified; and others had identical wording suggesting common fabrication rather than independent publication.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
While some articles appeared in qualifying major media, the submitted materials were deficient because: translations lacked required certifications; none of the articles had author credits as required; some articles were falsified; and others had identical wording suggesting common fabrication rather than independent publication.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_02_B2203; source_row=34451
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high salary or significantly high remuneration for services

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner provided only fragmentary documentation of earnings with no objective basis for field-wide comparison. The purported article calling her a best-selling author was found to be falsified. Letters from publishers calling her the highest-paid writer in Bangladesh lacked supporting documentary evidence.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner provided only fragmentary documentation of earnings with no objective basis for field-wide comparison. The purported article calling her a best-selling author was found to be falsified. Letters from publishers calling her the highest-paid writer in Bangladesh lacked supporting documentary evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_02_B2203; source_row=34454
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

The membership requirements described for the [REDACTED] Academy (citizenship, age over 30, published books, endorsement by a fellow) do not amount to outstanding achievements. A contradicting letter showed the Petitioner joined at age 22, before the stated age requirement. Other associations' requirements were either not documented or not shown to require outstanding achievements.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The membership requirements described for the [REDACTED] Academy (citizenship, age over 30, published books, endorsement by a fellow) do not amount to outstanding achievements. A contradicting letter showed the Petitioner joined at age 22, before the stated age requirement. Other associations' requirements were either not documented or not shown to require outstanding achievements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_02_B2203; source_row=34450
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment