Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 6821–6830

EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

What the decision said

AAO did not reach the merits, remanding because the Director's blanket fraud finding lacked specificity and did not verify authenticity of submitted letters.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach the merits, remanding because the Director's blanket fraud finding lacked specificity and did not verify authenticity of submitted letters.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_01_B2203; source_row=34444
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material

What the decision said

AAO did not reach the merits, remanding for reevaluation; AAO noted the Director's inconsistency in acknowledging this criterion was met in the NOID but failing to address it in the final decision.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach the merits, remanding for reevaluation; AAO noted the Director's inconsistency in acknowledging this criterion was met in the NOID but failing to address it in the final decision.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_01_B2203; source_row=34443
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role

What the decision said

AAO did not reach the merits, remanding because the Director's blanket fraud finding was insufficiently supported and did not verify authenticity of submitted letters.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach the merits, remanding because the Director's blanket fraud finding was insufficiently supported and did not verify authenticity of submitted letters.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_01_B2203; source_row=34445
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed that the record supports the Beneficiary's leading or critical roles with the Petitioner and a prior U.S. employer, both of which enjoy distinguished reputations.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the record supports the Beneficiary's leading or critical roles with the Petitioner and a prior U.S. employer, both of which enjoy distinguished reputations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_03_B2203; source_row=34462
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

What the decision said

AAO declined to address this criterion because, even if met, it could not change the outcome of the appeal given the failure to establish criterion ix.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to address this criterion because, even if met, it could not change the outcome of the appeal given the failure to establish criterion ix.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_03_B2203; source_row=34461
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence of providing services to two apparent small businesses (a marble and granite company and a wallcovering company) did not demonstrate national or global implications. The support letters attested to his competence but did not detail national impact, and his broad claims about multimillion-dollar projects and investment patterns were unsupported by documentary evidence.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence of providing services to two apparent small businesses (a marble and granite company and a wallcovering company) did not demonstrate national or global implications. The support letters attested to his competence but did not detail national impact, and his broad claims about multimillion-dollar projects and investment patterns were unsupported by documentary evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_03_B5203; source_row=34465
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

advanced degree or equivalent qualification

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the Petitioner's degree was awarded on September 19, 2016, making the petition, filed August 12, 2021, premature by just over a month. Additionally, the experience letters contained overlapping employment claims and irreconcilable conflicts with nonimmigrant visa applications where the Petitioner listed himself as 'retired,' preventing verification of five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's degree was awarded on September 19, 2016, making the petition, filed August 12, 2021, premature by just over a month. Additionally, the experience letters contained overlapping employment claims and irreconcilable conflicts with nonimmigrant visa applications where the Petitioner listed himself as 'retired,' preventing verification of five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-14_01_B5203; source_row=34428
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed the proposed endeavor lacked national importance. The industry evidence addressed the mining sector broadly, not the Petitioner's specific endeavor. The expert opinion was inconsistent with other record evidence and did not elaborate on the proposed endeavor's prospective national or global impact.…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the proposed endeavor lacked national importance. The industry evidence addressed the mining sector broadly, not the Petitioner's specific endeavor. The expert opinion was inconsistent with other record evidence and did not elaborate on the proposed endeavor's prospective national or global impact. The business plan projections were unsupported and the evidence did not show that the Petitioner's skills differed from or improved upon those already available in the United States.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-14_01_B5203; source_row=34429
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance, since he relied on the industry's importance, the cumulative effect of similarly-situated workers, and his own qualifications rather than the prospective broader impact of his specific endeavor.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance, since he relied on the industry's importance, the cumulative effect of similarly-situated workers, and his own qualifications rather than the prospective broader impact of his specific endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-14_03_B5203; source_row=34436
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the Petitioner's updated professional plan made only broad, general claims without specifying which industry or field she intended to serve, and did not demonstrate how her specific employment services would extend beyond her prospective employer to impact any industry or the U.S. economy at a level commensurate with national importance.…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's updated professional plan made only broad, general claims without specifying which industry or field she intended to serve, and did not demonstrate how her specific employment services would extend beyond her prospective employer to impact any industry or the U.S. economy at a level commensurate with national importance. Arguments about her skills and accomplishments were misdirected to prong one rather than addressing the national importance of the endeavor itself.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-14_04_B5203; source_row=34439
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment