Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 6841–6850

NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to identify a sufficiently specific proposed endeavor, having listed numerous disparate activities any one of which could be a full-time job. Even accepting all activities collectively, the record did not establish national importance because the Petitioner conceded she will operate a small business and the recommendation letters and general articles did not demonstrate how the specific ende…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to identify a sufficiently specific proposed endeavor, having listed numerous disparate activities any one of which could be a full-time job. Even accepting all activities collectively, the record did not establish national importance because the Petitioner conceded she will operate a small business and the recommendation letters and general articles did not demonstrate how the specific endeavor would impact the field or economy at a national level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-13_02_B5203; source_row=34422
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States

What the decision said

AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the third Dhanasar prong because the first prong was not met, rendering further analysis unnecessary.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the third Dhanasar prong because the first prong was not met, rendering further analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-13_01_B5203; source_row=34421
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the second Dhanasar prong because the first prong was not met, rendering further analysis unnecessary.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the second Dhanasar prong because the first prong was not met, rendering further analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-13_01_B5203; source_row=34420
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the national importance sub-element not met, as the generalized plan to pilot and train pilots lacks the type of national or global implications within a field contemplated by Dhanasar. AAO reserved opinion on the substantial merit sub-element.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the national importance sub-element not met, as the generalized plan to pilot and train pilots lacks the type of national or global implications within a field contemplated by Dhanasar. AAO reserved opinion on the substantial merit sub-element.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-09_02_B5203; source_row=34415
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO reserved opinion on the second prong because the failure to establish the first prong was dispositive.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO reserved opinion on the second prong because the failure to establish the first prong was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-09_02_B5203; source_row=34416
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

exceptional ability final merits determination

What the decision said

AAO declined to reach the exceptional ability issue because the NIW analysis was independently dispositive.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the exceptional ability issue because the NIW analysis was independently dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-09_02_B5203; source_row=34414
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO reserved opinion on the third prong because the failure to establish the first prong was dispositive.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO reserved opinion on the third prong because the failure to establish the first prong was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-09_02_B5203; source_row=34417
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO did not reach Dhanasar prong 2 because the threshold EB-2 classification was not established.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach Dhanasar prong 2 because the threshold EB-2 classification was not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-09_01_B5203; source_row=34412
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO did not reach Dhanasar prong 3 because the threshold EB-2 classification was not established.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach Dhanasar prong 3 because the threshold EB-2 classification was not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-09_01_B5203; source_row=34413
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

What the decision said

AAO did not reach Dhanasar prong 1 because the threshold EB-2 classification was not established.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach Dhanasar prong 1 because the threshold EB-2 classification was not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-09_01_B5203; source_row=34411
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment