Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 6891–6900

NIWEB-1A · Final meritsNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

Final merits determination — degree of expertise significantly above ordinarily encountered

Why AAO was not persuaded

Although AAO stated it need not formally address the final merits determination given the petitioner's failure to meet the initial evidence threshold, it nonetheless reviewed the record and concluded the petitioner had not established the required level of expertise.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Although AAO stated it need not formally address the final merits determination given the petitioner's failure to meet the initial evidence threshold, it nonetheless reviewed the record and concluded the petitioner had not established the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-03_05_B5203; source_row=34351
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO affirmed that the nebulous nature of the Petitioner's proposed employment and endeavor prevented a determination of broader impact, and past accomplishments did not rise to the level needed to demonstrate the Petitioner is well-positioned to advance a nationally important endeavor.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed that the nebulous nature of the Petitioner's proposed employment and endeavor prevented a determination of broader impact, and past accomplishments did not rise to the level needed to demonstrate the Petitioner is well-positioned to advance a nationally important endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-03_04_B5203; source_row=34345
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO explicitly reserved remaining Dhanasar arguments, including any analysis of the third prong, because the identified reasons for dismissal were dispositive.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved remaining Dhanasar arguments, including any analysis of the third prong, because the identified reasons for dismissal were dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-03_04_B5203; source_row=34346
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

license or certification

license or certification for the profession

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agrees the licenses are unrelated to the technology field and that the presence of the Petitioner's app in the Apple Store does not function as comparable evidence of professional licensure.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agrees the licenses are unrelated to the technology field and that the presence of the Petitioner's app in the Apple Store does not function as comparable evidence of professional licensure.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-03_03_B5203; source_row=34337
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

ten years experience

ten years of full-time experience in the occupation

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agrees the Petitioner did not document ten years of full-time entrepreneurial experience. His pre-2015 work as a music artist/DJ was not shown to be in the same occupation as a tech CEO, and his entrepreneurial career since 2015 spanned less than seven years at the time of filing.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agrees the Petitioner did not document ten years of full-time entrepreneurial experience. His pre-2015 work as a music artist/DJ was not shown to be in the same occupation as a tech CEO, and his entrepreneurial career since 2015 spanned less than seven years at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-03_03_B5203; source_row=34336
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWacademic recordNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

academic record

official academic record (degree/diploma)

What the decision said

The Petitioner did not contest the Director's determination on this criterion on appeal, so AAO treats it as waived.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's determination on this criterion on appeal, so AAO treats it as waived.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-03_03_B5203; source_row=34335
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

What the decision said

AAO reserves this prong as unnecessary given the failure to qualify for EB-2.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO reserves this prong as unnecessary given the failure to qualify for EB-2.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-03_03_B5203; source_row=34341
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWrecognitionReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

recognition

recognition of achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field

What the decision said

AAO reserved this criterion because the Petitioner could not in any event meet three criteria, making analysis unnecessary.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO reserved this criterion because the Petitioner could not in any event meet three criteria, making analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-03_03_B5203; source_row=34340
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

Recognition for achievements and significant contributions (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))

What the decision said

AAO declined to reach this criterion because the petitioner had already failed to meet the minimum three-criteria threshold regardless of this criterion's outcome, making any finding purely advisory.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach this criterion because the petitioner had already failed to meet the minimum three-criteria threshold regardless of this criterion's outcome, making any finding purely advisory.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-03_05_B5203; source_row=34350
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

On balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO reserved prong three as unnecessary given the dispositive failure on prong one.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO reserved prong three as unnecessary given the dispositive failure on prong one.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-03_05_B5203; source_row=34354
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment