Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 6961–6970
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the endeavor lacked national importance. The Petitioner's projections for revenue and job creation were insufficiently substantiated, his reliance on the importance of IT/cybersecurity broadly was misplaced, and a new business plan submitted on appeal constituted a material change in the proposed endeavor and was disregarded for eligibility purposes.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the endeavor lacked national importance. The Petitioner's projections for revenue and job creation were insufficiently substantiated, his reliance on the importance of IT/cybersecurity broadly was misplaced, and a new business plan submitted on appeal constituted a material change in the proposed endeavor and was disregarded for eligibility purposes.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-26_02_B5203; source_row=34223 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner's own submissions consistently described his degree as incomplete; the transcript lacked a certified English translation and could not be credited; and even if credited, the transcript would not show a completed degree. The Petitioner cited no precedent or USCIS policy supporting his equivalency argument.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's own submissions consistently described his degree as incomplete; the transcript lacked a certified English translation and could not be credited; and even if credited, the transcript would not show a completed degree. The Petitioner cited no precedent or USCIS policy supporting his equivalency argument.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-26_03_B5203; source_row=34229 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalPhysician
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
Substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to show national importance, finding that providing medical services at a small clinic or managing it does not broadly impact the medical field or healthcare access in the United States. General assertions about the healthcare industry do not substitute for showing the specific proposed endeavor's national impact, and the business plan's projections lacked supporting data and analysis.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to show national importance, finding that providing medical services at a small clinic or managing it does not broadly impact the medical field or healthcare access in the United States. General assertions about the healthcare industry do not substitute for showing the specific proposed endeavor's national impact, and the business plan's projections lacked supporting data and analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-26_01_B5203; source_row=34214 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Foreign equivalent degree to U.S. advanced or baccalaureate degree
Why AAO was not persuaded
The credential evaluation based on work experience and job training does not satisfy the requirement for a foreign equivalent degree to a U.S. baccalaureate degree; regulations do not permit occupational experience to substitute for a formal degree.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The credential evaluation based on work experience and job training does not satisfy the requirement for a foreign equivalent degree to a U.S. baccalaureate degree; regulations do not permit occupational experience to substitute for a formal degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-26_04_B5203; source_row=34233 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty
Why AAO was not persuaded
The employer letters did not specify the period of employment or describe duties in a way demonstrating progressive experience, and the credential evaluation did not identify the specific documents relied upon, leaving it uncorroborated. Company documents dated 2021 did not cover a sufficient time period.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The employer letters did not specify the period of employment or describe duties in a way demonstrating progressive experience, and the credential evaluation did not identify the specific documents relied upon, leaving it uncorroborated. Company documents dated 2021 did not cover a sufficient time period.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-26_04_B5203; source_row=34234 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Environment / Energy
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner failed to submit pay slips or contractual agreements to substantiate his income, did not provide the referenced glassdoor.com and payscale.com data, and compared his earnings to 'Accountants & Finance Managers' rather than to others in his actual field as a business sustainability specialist.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to submit pay slips or contractual agreements to substantiate his income, did not provide the referenced glassdoor.com and payscale.com data, and compared his earnings to 'Accountants & Finance Managers' rather than to others in his actual field as a business sustainability specialist.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-26_01_B2203; source_row=34211 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Environment / Energy
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the evidence reflected the Petitioner's original contribution, the software's usage and impact was limited to a single organization. The supporting letter was conclusory and lacked specific details explaining how the software impacted the field in a major way.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
While the evidence reflected the Petitioner's original contribution, the software's usage and impact was limited to a single organization. The supporting letter was conclusory and lacked specific details explaining how the software impacted the field in a major way.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-26_01_B2203; source_row=34208 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organization
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letter did not establish a leading role because it did not mention the Petitioner's job title or duties indicative of leadership. The letter also failed to elaborate how the Petitioner's contributions were of significant importance to the organization's activities for a critical role. Furthermore, neither the certificate nor the letter established the distinguished reputation of the organization.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letter did not establish a leading role because it did not mention the Petitioner's job title or duties indicative of leadership. The letter also failed to elaborate how the Petitioner's contributions were of significant importance to the organization's activities for a critical role. Furthermore, neither the certificate nor the letter established the distinguished reputation of the organization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-26_01_B2203; source_row=34210 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The 'Best Worker' certificate lacked supporting evidence of national or international recognition. The DAAD letter provided background but did not establish how the field views the scholarship or why it is nationally or internationally recognized as an award for excellence in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The 'Best Worker' certificate lacked supporting evidence of national or international recognition. The DAAD letter provided background but did not establish how the field views the scholarship or why it is nationally or internationally recognized as an award for excellence in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-26_01_B2203; source_row=34205 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner waived arguments regarding the committee memberships by not contesting the Director's decision on appeal. Regarding IASSIST, the letter showed membership requires only that practitioners in the discipline apply, not outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner waived arguments regarding the committee memberships by not contesting the Director's decision on appeal. Regarding IASSIST, the letter showed membership requires only that practitioners in the discipline apply, not outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-26_01_B2203; source_row=34206 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c