Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / ManagementBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's analysis, finding the business plan's revenue projections ($7.68 million in year five against a $94.7 billion market), staffing levels, and geographic scope insufficient to demonstrate national or broader implications. AAO also clarified that the relevant inquiry is the specific proposed endeavor's implications, not the general importance of the homebuilding industry.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's analysis, finding the business plan's revenue projections ($7.68 million in year five against a $94.7 billion market), staffing levels, and geographic scope insufficient to demonstrate national or broader implications. AAO also clarified that the relevant inquiry is the specific proposed endeavor's implications, not the general importance of the homebuilding industry.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-25_03_B5203; source_row=34196 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / ManagementBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO noted that the Director found the second prong satisfied and did not disturb that finding. The Petitioner's expertise from prior experience relates to this prong, and the Director properly credited it.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted that the Director found the second prong satisfied and did not disturb that finding. The Petitioner's expertise from prior experience relates to this prong, and the Director properly credited it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-25_03_B5203; source_row=34197 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded the petitioner's failure to identify a specific endeavor obfuscates its prospective impact and prevents a determination of national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the petitioner's failure to identify a specific endeavor obfuscates its prospective impact and prevents a determination of national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-24_02_B5203; source_row=34161 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that neither the Petitioner's submissions nor the expert opinion letter demonstrated the national importance of the specific proposed endeavor. The arguments focused on the aviation industry broadly rather than the broader implications of the Petitioner's particular employment, and the record lacked evidence of significant U.S. economic impact or job creation attributable to his future work.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that neither the Petitioner's submissions nor the expert opinion letter demonstrated the national importance of the specific proposed endeavor. The arguments focused on the aviation industry broadly rather than the broader implications of the Petitioner's particular employment, and the record lacked evidence of significant U.S. economic impact or job creation attributable to his future work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-24_07_B5203; source_row=34176 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but found national importance lacking. The Petitioner relied on her credentials and general claims about healthcare and economic benefits without corroborating evidence tying her specific endeavor to broader impact on the field or U.S. economy.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but found national importance lacking. The Petitioner relied on her credentials and general claims about healthcare and economic benefits without corroborating evidence tying her specific endeavor to broader impact on the field or U.S. economy.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-24_06_B5203; source_row=34173 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but not national importance. The proposed endeavor was too vague at filing—no specific product was identified—making it impossible to assess its potential economic impact. The economic impact analysis relied on post-filing employment data and thus could not establish eligibility at time of filing.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but not national importance. The proposed endeavor was too vague at filing—no specific product was identified—making it impossible to assess its potential economic impact. The economic impact analysis relied on post-filing employment data and thus could not establish eligibility at time of filing. Expert and recommendation letters focused on the Petitioner's skills rather than the endeavor's broader national impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-24_05_B5203; source_row=34170 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c