Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 7111–7120
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the personal statement, letters of support, letters of interest, curriculum vitae, and membership certificate were all either unreliable due to signature and translation authenticity issues or substantively insufficient to establish how well positioned the petitioner was to advance the proposed endeavor.…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the personal statement, letters of support, letters of interest, curriculum vitae, and membership certificate were all either unreliable due to signature and translation authenticity issues or substantively insufficient to establish how well positioned the petitioner was to advance the proposed endeavor. Letters related to employee work at existing companies rather than founding or operating an independent consulting company, and no evidence showed registration of a company or meaningful progress.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-10_03_B5203; source_row=33993 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agrees the endeavor has substantial merit but finds it lacks national importance. The Petitioner did not show his work as a supply chain expert/internal auditor would have substantial positive economic effects, employ a significant population, or impact the broader field beyond individual employers. Government supply chain initiatives do not by themselves confer national importance to his specific endeavor.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agrees the endeavor has substantial merit but finds it lacks national importance. The Petitioner did not show his work as a supply chain expert/internal auditor would have substantial positive economic effects, employ a significant population, or impact the broader field beyond individual employers. Government supply chain initiatives do not by themselves confer national importance to his specific endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-10_04_B5203; source_row=33995 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
While the record supports substantial merit, the Petitioner failed to show the specific proposed endeavor—operating a physical therapy clinic—has national importance. The expert letter addressed the importance of the profession broadly rather than the specific endeavor, and the Petitioner provided insufficient evidence that her clinic's impact would extend beyond its own clients and staff to the field, public health, or the…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
While the record supports substantial merit, the Petitioner failed to show the specific proposed endeavor—operating a physical therapy clinic—has national importance. The expert letter addressed the importance of the profession broadly rather than the specific endeavor, and the Petitioner provided insufficient evidence that her clinic's impact would extend beyond its own clients and staff to the field, public health, or the national economy.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-10_06_B5203; source_row=34008 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Commanded salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
The salary survey used broad job descriptions not aligned with the Petitioner's proposed endeavor as an entrepreneur, there was no benchmark for exceptional-ability entrepreneurial compensation, and the income figure in the accountant's letter could not be verified against the submitted tax return.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The salary survey used broad job descriptions not aligned with the Petitioner's proposed endeavor as an entrepreneur, there was no benchmark for exceptional-ability entrepreneurial compensation, and the income figure in the accountant's letter could not be verified against the submitted tax return.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-10_01_B5203; source_row=33982 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The association is a trade union, not a professional association. The record does not describe its composition or establish it is a professional association as contemplated by the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The association is a trade union, not a professional association. The record does not describe its composition or establish it is a professional association as contemplated by the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-10_01_B5203; source_row=33983 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the proposed endeavor has merit in business but found the evidence failed to demonstrate national importance. The expert opinion letter cited general industry statistics and did not explain how the Petitioner's specific skills would generate impact beyond his employer or broadly affect the hospitality industry.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the proposed endeavor has merit in business but found the evidence failed to demonstrate national importance. The expert opinion letter cited general industry statistics and did not explain how the Petitioner's specific skills would generate impact beyond his employer or broadly affect the hospitality industry.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-10_05_B5203; source_row=34005 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although the final merits determination was not required because the Petitioner failed to meet three criteria, AAO reviewed the entire record and concluded it does not establish that the Petitioner is recognized as having a degree of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the final merits determination was not required because the Petitioner failed to meet three criteria, AAO reviewed the entire record and concluded it does not establish that the Petitioner is recognized as having a degree of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-10_05_B5203; source_row=34004 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner's two credentials are each equivalent to less than a U.S. bachelor's degree. The third evaluation combining credentials with experience is rejected because the regulations do not permit combining lesser credentials or substituting experience for education. Non-precedent decisions cited by Petitioner are not binding and cannot be evaluated without citations or copies.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's two credentials are each equivalent to less than a U.S. bachelor's degree. The third evaluation combining credentials with experience is rejected because the regulations do not permit combining lesser credentials or substituting experience for education. Non-precedent decisions cited by Petitioner are not binding and cannot be evaluated without citations or copies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-10_05_B5203; source_row=33998 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c