Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 7121–7130
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer and labor certification
What the decision said
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the third Dhanasar prong because the petitioner was already found ineligible on prongs one and two, making the third prong unnecessary to the decision.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the third Dhanasar prong because the petitioner was already found ineligible on prongs one and two, making the third prong unnecessary to the decision.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-10_03_B5203; source_row=33994 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the personal statement unreliable due to unauthenticated pixelated signatures and lack of identified translator, undermining its probative value. Even if credited, the proposed consulting business described tailor-made services for individual clients with no national or global implications, no improved processes, and no meaningful employment of U.S. workers as contemplated by Dhanasar.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the personal statement unreliable due to unauthenticated pixelated signatures and lack of identified translator, undermining its probative value. Even if credited, the proposed consulting business described tailor-made services for individual clients with no national or global implications, no improved processes, and no meaningful employment of U.S. workers as contemplated by Dhanasar.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-10_03_B5203; source_row=33992 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Recognition for achievements and significant contributions
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the Director and withdrew the criterion-(F) finding. The Quality Seal certificate lacked supporting documentation showing it evidenced exceptional expertise, and the letters of recommendation reflected competent professional performance rather than achievements or significant contributions significantly above the ordinary.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director and withdrew the criterion-(F) finding. The Quality Seal certificate lacked supporting documentation showing it evidenced exceptional expertise, and the letters of recommendation reflected competent professional performance rather than achievements or significant contributions significantly above the ordinary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-10_01_B5203; source_row=33984 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
Ten years of full-time experience (employer letters)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not submit letters from current or former employers. The accountant's letter is insufficient because the accountant was not an employer, and the remaining evidence does not describe full-time duties over ten or more years in adequate detail.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not submit letters from current or former employers. The accountant's letter is insufficient because the accountant was not an employer, and the remaining evidence does not describe full-time duties over ten or more years in adequate detail.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-10_01_B5203; source_row=33980 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The evidence documented a total of only 8 years and 5 months of qualifying managerial experience, less than the required 10 years. Other positions as receptionist, head of reception, and consultant were insufficient to show employment in the position of tourism and hospitality manager.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The evidence documented a total of only 8 years and 5 months of qualifying managerial experience, less than the required 10 years. Other positions as receptionist, head of reception, and consultant were insufficient to show employment in the position of tourism and hospitality manager.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-10_05_B5203; source_row=34000 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner has not submitted evidence that he holds a license or certification for his occupation as required by the plain language of the regulation, so he does not meet this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner has not submitted evidence that he holds a license or certification for his occupation as required by the plain language of the regulation, so he does not meet this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-10-10_05_B5203; source_row=34001 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c