Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 7271–7280

NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States

What the decision said

AAO expressly reserved this prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the first prong, making it unnecessary to reach prong three.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO expressly reserved this prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the first prong, making it unnecessary to reach prong three.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-26_04_B5203; source_row=33768
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed that the endeavor has substantial merit but found the evidence insufficient to establish national importance. The Petitioner's teaching methods were not shown to be truly innovative or to have an impact beyond the specific communities served, and use of LDMs and flashcards did not rise to the level of broadly impacting the education or science fields.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the endeavor has substantial merit but found the evidence insufficient to establish national importance. The Petitioner's teaching methods were not shown to be truly innovative or to have an impact beyond the specific communities served, and use of LDMs and flashcards did not rise to the level of broadly impacting the education or science fields.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-25_01_B5203; source_row=33743
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit (a point the Director had not addressed), but agreed with the Director that national importance was not established. The business plan projections lacked evidentiary support and contained unexplained discrepancies with the earlier professional plan. Recommendation letters addressed only past accomplishments, not prospective national impact.…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the proposed endeavor had substantial merit (a point the Director had not addressed), but agreed with the Director that national importance was not established. The business plan projections lacked evidentiary support and contained unexplained discrepancies with the earlier professional plan. Recommendation letters addressed only past accomplishments, not prospective national impact. The expert opinion letter focused on Latin American business connections not actually part of the proposed endeavor. Industry reports spoke to the financial field generally and not the Petitioner's specific endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-25_05_B5203; source_row=33755
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agrees the endeavor has substantial merit but finds the Petitioner did not demonstrate national importance: the expert letter recites industry-wide statistics rather than the specific endeavor's impact, the business plan lacks projected employees, clients, or revenues, and being a small part of a solution to financial literacy is insufficient.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agrees the endeavor has substantial merit but finds the Petitioner did not demonstrate national importance: the expert letter recites industry-wide statistics rather than the specific endeavor's impact, the business plan lacks projected employees, clients, or revenues, and being a small part of a solution to financial literacy is insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-25_02_B5203; source_row=33746
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that generalized industry data about the freight trucking sector does not establish national importance for the Petitioner's specific endeavor. The record only showed the endeavor would benefit the Petitioner's employer, coworkers, and clients. Merely repeating Dhanasar language without substantiation is insufficient.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that generalized industry data about the freight trucking sector does not establish national importance for the Petitioner's specific endeavor. The record only showed the endeavor would benefit the Petitioner's employer, coworkers, and clients. Merely repeating Dhanasar language without substantiation is insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-25_04_B5203; source_row=33752
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, waiving the job offer requirement would benefit the United States

What the decision said

AAO reserved the merits of this prong for the Director to address on remand, directing the Director to address all of the Petitioner's arguments and evidence and explain the relative decisional weight given to each balancing factor.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO reserved the merits of this prong for the Director to address on remand, directing the Director to address all of the Petitioner's arguments and evidence and explain the relative decisional weight given to each balancing factor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-25_03_B5203; source_row=33751
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

What the decision said

AAO found the Director erred by refusing to consider post-filing evidence that was directly requested via RFE and was submitted to document and clarify the Petitioner's plans as initially described at filing. AAO reserved the merits of the national importance determination for the Director to address on remand with the full record.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director erred by refusing to consider post-filing evidence that was directly requested via RFE and was submitted to document and clarify the Petitioner's plans as initially described at filing. AAO reserved the merits of the national importance determination for the Director to address on remand with the full record.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-25_03_B5203; source_row=33749
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO reserved the merits of this prong for the Director to analyze on remand, directing that all submitted evidence be reviewed and that the Director articulate the basis for the finding.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO reserved the merits of this prong for the Director to analyze on remand, directing that all submitted evidence be reviewed and that the Director articulate the basis for the finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-25_03_B5203; source_row=33750
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer and labor certification

What the decision said

AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the third Dhanasar prong because the first prong was not met, making it unnecessary to reach the issue.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the third Dhanasar prong because the first prong was not met, making it unnecessary to reach the issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-25_04_B5203; source_row=33754
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the second Dhanasar prong because the first prong was not met, making it unnecessary to reach the issue.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the second Dhanasar prong because the first prong was not met, making it unnecessary to reach the issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-25_04_B5203; source_row=33753
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment