Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 7311–7320

NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's finding, noting the evidence showed only employer- and client-specific work and did not demonstrate national scope.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's finding, noting the evidence showed only employer- and client-specific work and did not demonstrate national scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-20_01_B5203; source_row=33683
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO reserved judgment on the third prong because the first prong was not met and it was unnecessary to the result.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO reserved judgment on the third prong because the first prong was not met and it was unnecessary to the result.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-20_03_B5203; source_row=33690
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO reserved judgment on the second prong because the first prong was not met and it was unnecessary to the result.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO reserved judgment on the second prong because the first prong was not met and it was unnecessary to the result.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-20_03_B5203; source_row=33689
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social SciencesFaculty

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the proposed single-location swim school with projected employment of seven workers and modest economic impact did not rise to the level of national importance. The proposed instructor training courses would reach only a limited number of participants with no demonstrated broader field impact, the business did not align sufficiently with national initiatives, and the letters of recommendation did not address…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the proposed single-location swim school with projected employment of seven workers and modest economic impact did not rise to the level of national importance. The proposed instructor training courses would reach only a limited number of participants with no demonstrated broader field impact, the business did not align sufficiently with national initiatives, and the letters of recommendation did not address national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-19_01_B5203; source_row=33680
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

prizes or awards

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO found that the record shows the Petitioner received two IPA honorable mention citations in the same year for two separate photos in the 'Professional' competition level, supported by evidence of global media coverage, corporate partners, and international competitors, establishing internationally recognized awards for excellence in her field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the record shows the Petitioner received two IPA honorable mention citations in the same year for two separate photos in the 'Professional' competition level, supported by evidence of global media coverage, corporate partners, and international competitors, establishing internationally recognized awards for excellence in her field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-19_01_B2203; source_row=33675
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

Both the Director and the AAO agreed that the Petitioner met the judging criterion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
Both the Director and the AAO agreed that the Petitioner met the judging criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-19_01_B2203; source_row=33677
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien

Why the evidence was persuasive

Both the Director and the AAO agreed that the Petitioner met the published material criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Both the Director and the AAO agreed that the Petitioner met the published material criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-19_01_B2203; source_row=33676
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display at artistic exhibitions or showcases

What the decision said

The AAO reserved this criterion as unnecessary to decide because the Petitioner had already met three criteria.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO reserved this criterion as unnecessary to decide because the Petitioner had already met three criteria.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-19_01_B2203; source_row=33678
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The recommendation letters praised the Petitioner personally but did not offer persuasive detail on broader impact beyond his students or clients. Industry reports addressed the profession generally rather than the Petitioner's specific endeavor. The business plan's projections lacked sufficient basis and did not demonstrate national importance such as significant job creation or substantial positive economic effects.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The recommendation letters praised the Petitioner personally but did not offer persuasive detail on broader impact beyond his students or clients. Industry reports addressed the profession generally rather than the Petitioner's specific endeavor. The business plan's projections lacked sufficient basis and did not demonstrate national importance such as significant job creation or substantial positive economic effects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-18_04_B5203; source_row=33660
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed the endeavor had substantial merit but found national importance unestablished: recommendation letters lacked persuasive detail on broader impact, industry reports only showed the importance of the field generally rather than the specific endeavor, and the business plan projections were unsupported and insufficient to show substantial positive economic effects rising to national importance.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor had substantial merit but found national importance unestablished: recommendation letters lacked persuasive detail on broader impact, industry reports only showed the importance of the field generally rather than the specific endeavor, and the business plan projections were unsupported and insufficient to show substantial positive economic effects rising to national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-18_05_B5203; source_row=33664
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment