Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 7361–7370

NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AIBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed the endeavor lacked national importance. The record did not sufficiently demonstrate how wider adoption of multi-factor authentication would impact the field nationally or globally, the advisory opinion letters were authored by non-experts in cybersecurity and did not analyze national importance, and the part-time job creation plans lacked specificity as to locality or economic impact.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor lacked national importance. The record did not sufficiently demonstrate how wider adoption of multi-factor authentication would impact the field nationally or globally, the advisory opinion letters were authored by non-experts in cybersecurity and did not analyze national importance, and the part-time job creation plans lacked specificity as to locality or economic impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_07_B5203; source_row=33595
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AIBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

commanding salary demonstrating exceptional ability (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(D))

Why AAO was not persuaded

The record did not reflect the salary expected for individuals of exceptional ability performing comparable duties, and the broad job description of systems analysts did not correspond to the Petitioner's proposed endeavor as a cybersecurity technology entrepreneur.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The record did not reflect the salary expected for individuals of exceptional ability performing comparable duties, and the broad job description of systems analysts did not correspond to the Petitioner's proposed endeavor as a cybersecurity technology entrepreneur.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_07_B5203; source_row=33592
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWEB-1A · High remunerationNot established

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

commanded a salary or other remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO agreed with the Director that the salary evidence could not be evaluated because the record lacked comparable compensation data for financial analysts of exceptional ability, and the bank manager job descriptions did not correspond to the Petitioner's proposed financial analyst duties.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed with the Director that the salary evidence could not be evaluated because the record lacked comparable compensation data for financial analysts of exceptional ability, and the bank manager job descriptions did not correspond to the Petitioner's proposed financial analyst duties.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_04_B5203; source_row=33570
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWEB-1A · MembershipNot established

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in professional associations

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Trade Union of Employees in Bank and Financial Establishments is a trade union, not a professional association as contemplated by the regulation, and the record did not describe its composition or establish it as a professional association.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Trade Union of Employees in Bank and Financial Establishments is a trade union, not a professional association as contemplated by the regulation, and the record did not describe its composition or establish it as a professional association.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_04_B5203; source_row=33571
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to establish he was well-positioned, finding the record lacked a record of success in the U.S. medical device industry, an adequate business plan, sufficient evidence of progress, or interest from potential customers at the time of filing.…

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to establish he was well-positioned, finding the record lacked a record of success in the U.S. medical device industry, an adequate business plan, sufficient evidence of progress, or interest from potential customers at the time of filing. The post-filing consultancy agreement could not establish eligibility as of the petition date, and the recommendation letters focused entirely on work in Brazil rather than the U.S. market.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_01_B5203; source_row=33559
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO reaffirmed its prior aggregate review concluding the Petitioner had not shown sustained national or international acclaim or that he is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO reaffirmed its prior aggregate review concluding the Petitioner had not shown sustained national or international acclaim or that he is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_01_B2203; source_row=33557
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO reaffirmed that the Petitioner did not show his particular role on team projects was critical to a definable operational component of any organization, and submitted no evidence that the agencies themselves had distinguished reputations beyond the prominence of their clients.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO reaffirmed that the Petitioner did not show his particular role on team projects was critical to a definable operational component of any organization, and submitted no evidence that the agencies themselves had distinguished reputations beyond the prominence of their clients.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_01_B2203; source_row=33556
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherEngineer

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the third prong because the identified deficiencies on the proposed endeavor and the first prong were dispositive.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the third prong because the identified deficiencies on the proposed endeavor and the first prong were dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_09_B5203; source_row=33603
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherEngineer

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the second prong because the first prong deficiency and the undefined proposed endeavor were dispositive, citing INS v. Bagamasbad.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the second prong because the first prong deficiency and the undefined proposed endeavor were dispositive, citing INS v. Bagamasbad.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_09_B5203; source_row=33602
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

FinanceBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

license or certification

license to practice the profession or certification for a particular profession or occupation

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner conceded she does not have a professional license or CPA certification. Membership in the South Carolina Association of CPAs does not satisfy the requirement of a license or certification, and future eligibility cannot establish eligibility at the time of filing.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner conceded she does not have a professional license or CPA certification. Membership in the South Carolina Association of CPAs does not satisfy the requirement of a license or certification, and future eligibility cannot establish eligibility at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-13_05_B5203; source_row=33578
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment