Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 731740

EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AIManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

What the decision said

The Director noted the petitioner did not assert eligibility under criterion (i), and AAO confirmed the petitioner does not assert it on appeal.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Director noted the petitioner did not assert eligibility under criterion (i), and AAO confirmed the petitioner does not assert it on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-17_06_B2203; source_row=44182
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AIManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

What the decision said

The Petitioner does not assert on appeal—and the record does not support the conclusion—that the record satisfies criterion (vii).

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner does not assert on appeal—and the record does not support the conclusion—that the record satisfies criterion (vii).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-17_06_B2203; source_row=44184
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Commercial successNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AIManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Commercial success

commercial successes in the performing arts

What the decision said

The Petitioner does not assert on appeal—and the record does not support the conclusion—that the record satisfies criterion (x).

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner does not assert on appeal—and the record does not support the conclusion—that the record satisfies criterion (x).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-17_06_B2203; source_row=44185
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO concluded the Petitioner failed to show broader implications beyond her direct clients and employees, that economic projections were conjectural and not shown to amount to substantial positive economic effects, and that expert/support letters were largely conclusory or focused on prong-2 considerations.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the Petitioner failed to show broader implications beyond her direct clients and employees, that economic projections were conjectural and not shown to amount to substantial positive economic effects, and that expert/support letters were largely conclusory or focused on prong-2 considerations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-17_05_B5203; source_row=44173
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO reserved the third prong for the Director on remand, to be analyzed as necessary following the national importance determination.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO reserved the third prong for the Director on remand, to be analyzed as necessary following the national importance determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-17_03_B5203; source_row=44161
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO reserved the second prong for the Director on remand, to be analyzed as necessary based on the Director's determination with respect to national importance.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO reserved the second prong for the Director on remand, to be analyzed as necessary based on the Director's determination with respect to national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-17_03_B5203; source_row=44160
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

Both SCOPS and AAO agreed the Petitioner satisfied the scholarly articles criterion.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
Both SCOPS and AAO agreed the Petitioner satisfied the scholarly articles criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-17_04_B2203; source_row=44164
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences48 citations

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO concluded the Petitioner addressed the importance of the subject matter rather than the specific endeavor. The record lacked corroborating evidence of broader implications in the field, the projected $1-3 billion investment figures were unexplained, and operating in an economically depressed area is not by itself sufficient to show national importance.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the Petitioner addressed the importance of the subject matter rather than the specific endeavor. The record lacked corroborating evidence of broader implications in the field, the projected $1-3 billion investment figures were unexplained, and operating in an economically depressed area is not by itself sufficient to show national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-16_03_B5203; source_row=44141
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mathematics / Statistics

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high salary or significantly high remuneration

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner's salary of $79,166 fell below the 90th percentile threshold of $84,010 for elementary school teachers in her geographic area per O*NET data. Comparison to Philippine wages was inappropriate because USCIS policy requires comparison to foreign wages only when a petitioner works outside the United States.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's salary of $79,166 fell below the 90th percentile threshold of $84,010 for elementary school teachers in her geographic area per O*NET data. Comparison to Philippine wages was inappropriate because USCIS policy requires comparison to foreign wages only when a petitioner works outside the United States.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-16_03_B2203; source_row=44139
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mathematics / Statistics

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner's support letters described her as a talented teacher but did not explain the significance of her contributions to the broader field. The record lacked independent, objective evidence that her contributions had major significance beyond her locality or immediate professional circle.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's support letters described her as a talented teacher but did not explain the significance of her contributions to the broader field. The record lacked independent, objective evidence that her contributions had major significance beyond her locality or immediate professional circle.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-04-16_03_B2203; source_row=44136
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
Back to assessment