Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The academic evaluation confirmed only a U.S. bachelor's degree equivalent. One employer letter covered experience prior to the degree, and the other showed only approximately three years and eleven months of post-baccalaureate experience — insufficient to satisfy the five-year requirement under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The academic evaluation confirmed only a U.S. bachelor's degree equivalent. One employer letter covered experience prior to the degree, and the other showed only approximately three years and eleven months of post-baccalaureate experience — insufficient to satisfy the five-year requirement under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-11_05_B5203; source_row=33524 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the record only contained generic descriptions of an international arbitration legal advisor's duties without a personal supporting statement, that counsel's assertions do not constitute evidence, and that evidence of the ADR field generally did not show the Petitioner's individual work would have national importance. AAO declined to consider the newly formed company as a material change to the proposed endeavor.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the record only contained generic descriptions of an international arbitration legal advisor's duties without a personal supporting statement, that counsel's assertions do not constitute evidence, and that evidence of the ADR field generally did not show the Petitioner's individual work would have national importance. AAO declined to consider the newly formed company as a material change to the proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-11_04_B5203; source_row=33521 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's determination that the Petitioner failed to establish national importance, finding that the Petitioner provided no new evidence or arguments to overcome the Director's determination.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's determination that the Petitioner failed to establish national importance, finding that the Petitioner provided no new evidence or arguments to overcome the Director's determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-11_06_B5203; source_row=33533 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's foreign credentials equate only to a U.S. high school diploma and that the credentials evaluator's opinion based on work experience rather than academic degrees is of little probative value.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's foreign credentials equate only to a U.S. high school diploma and that the credentials evaluator's opinion based on work experience rather than academic degrees is of little probative value.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-11_06_B5203; source_row=33528 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The endeavor is meritorious but the record does not show broader implications for the architectural design field or substantial economic/societal effects beyond the Petitioner's business and clients; financial and staffing projections are insufficiently supported and the projected 15 jobs and $1.8M in payroll/taxes do not rise to national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The endeavor is meritorious but the record does not show broader implications for the architectural design field or substantial economic/societal effects beyond the Petitioner's business and clients; financial and staffing projections are insufficiently supported and the projected 15 jobs and $1.8M in payroll/taxes do not rise to national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-11_03_B5203; source_row=33518 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Architectural designer is not an occupation requiring a U.S. bachelor's degree (per O*NET 17-3011), and the credentials evaluation impermissibly combines two lesser educational credentials to construct a single bachelor's-degree equivalent.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Architectural designer is not an occupation requiring a U.S. bachelor's degree (per O*NET 17-3011), and the credentials evaluation impermissibly combines two lesser educational credentials to construct a single bachelor's-degree equivalent.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-11_03_B5203; source_row=33517 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
meet at least three exceptional ability evidentiary criteria
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision, noting the Petitioner failed to specifically challenge the Director's analysis of the disputed criteria and merely repeated his prior RFE response verbatim without new arguments or evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision, noting the Petitioner failed to specifically challenge the Director's analysis of the disputed criteria and merely repeated his prior RFE response verbatim without new arguments or evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-11_01_B5203; source_row=33510 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that evidence of attendance at various airline pilot training programs offered at flight schools, combined with training certificates, resume, flight logs, pilot licenses, and employer letters, was sufficient to meet the plain language of the degree criterion — which does not require a college or university degree.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that evidence of attendance at various airline pilot training programs offered at flight schools, combined with training certificates, resume, flight logs, pilot licenses, and employer letters, was sufficient to meet the plain language of the degree criterion — which does not require a college or university degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-11_06_B5203; source_row=33529 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that standard professional qualifications and performance of normal airline pilot duties do not demonstrate expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered. The expert letter was conclusory and failed to document specific significant contributions to the field. Reference letters lacked corroborative evidence of impact or recognition outside the Petitioner's employers.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that standard professional qualifications and performance of normal airline pilot duties do not demonstrate expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered. The expert letter was conclusory and failed to document specific significant contributions to the field. Reference letters lacked corroborative evidence of impact or recognition outside the Petitioner's employers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-11_06_B5203; source_row=33532 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c