Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 7451–7460

NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

What the decision said

The AAO declined to reach the third prong because the denial of the first prong was dispositive of the appeal.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The AAO declined to reach the third prong because the denial of the first prong was dispositive of the appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-06_01_B5203; source_row=33458
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

The AAO declined to reach the second prong because the denial of the first prong was dispositive of the appeal.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The AAO declined to reach the second prong because the denial of the first prong was dispositive of the appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-06_01_B5203; source_row=33457
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Civil / Structural Engineering

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer and labor certification

What the decision said

The AAO declined to reach the third prong because failure on the first prong was dispositive.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The AAO declined to reach the third prong because failure on the first prong was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-06_02_B5203; source_row=33461
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Civil / Structural Engineering

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

The AAO declined to reach the second prong because failure on the first prong was dispositive.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The AAO declined to reach the second prong because failure on the first prong was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-06_02_B5203; source_row=33460
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed the endeavor had substantial merit but found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance because the evidence addressed the industry or occupation generally rather than the specific endeavor's broader impact, and the recommendation letters made generalized conclusory claims without showing influence beyond the employer and direct clients.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor had substantial merit but found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance because the evidence addressed the industry or occupation generally rather than the specific endeavor's broader impact, and the recommendation letters made generalized conclusory claims without showing influence beyond the employer and direct clients.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-05_02_B5203; source_row=33450
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found the Petitioner did not establish national importance because the business plan's economic and job-creation projections were unsupported, the record did not document the claimed $600,000 investment, the work would not extend beyond the Petitioner's company and clientele to impact the field or economy more broadly, and inconsistent descriptions of the endeavor made it un…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found the Petitioner did not establish national importance because the business plan's economic and job-creation projections were unsupported, the record did not document the claimed $600,000 investment, the work would not extend beyond the Petitioner's company and clientele to impact the field or economy more broadly, and inconsistent descriptions of the endeavor made it unclear what specific endeavor she intended to pursue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-05_03_B5203; source_row=33453
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the support letters did not identify unique knowledge or specific expertise beyond that expected of a physical therapist, the expert letter merely echoed the Petitioner's self-description, and there was no evidence of progress (location, equipment, hires) or of access to claimed investment funding.…

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the support letters did not identify unique knowledge or specific expertise beyond that expected of a physical therapist, the expert letter merely echoed the Petitioner's self-description, and there was no evidence of progress (location, equipment, hires) or of access to claimed investment funding. The inconsistent descriptions of the endeavor also prevented AAO from determining whether she was well positioned to achieve a specific endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-05_03_B5203; source_row=33454
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found substantial merit but not national importance. The business plan's projections (19 employees, $4.1M gross revenue, $256K tax revenue over five years) were unsupported and not commensurate with national importance in a sector generating billions in revenue and employing 500,000+ workers.…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found substantial merit but not national importance. The business plan's projections (19 employees, $4.1M gross revenue, $256K tax revenue over five years) were unsupported and not commensurate with national importance in a sector generating billions in revenue and employing 500,000+ workers. HUBZone claims were unsubstantiated, and broader-implications evidence (training, expert letter, reference letters) failed to show impact beyond direct workshop participants.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-05_01_B5203; source_row=33447
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO reserved the third prong as unnecessary to the decision given the first-prong dispositive failure.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO reserved the third prong as unnecessary to the decision given the first-prong dispositive failure.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-05_02_B5203; source_row=33452
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States

What the decision said

AAO reserved prong 3 because prongs 1 and 2 were dispositive.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO reserved prong 3 because prongs 1 and 2 were dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-09-05_03_B5203; source_row=33455
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment