Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 7481–7490
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found the record does not show the prospective impact of the Petitioner's IT consulting and tracking technology business rises to national importance. The expert letter addressed the national importance of the IT field generally rather than the Petitioner's specific endeavor, and the business plan's staffing and revenue projections were unsupported.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the record does not show the prospective impact of the Petitioner's IT consulting and tracking technology business rises to national importance. The expert letter addressed the national importance of the IT field generally rather than the Petitioner's specific endeavor, and the business plan's staffing and revenue projections were unsupported. The Petitioner did not show his work would impact the transportation industry, IT consulting field, or U.S. economy more broadly.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-30_01_B5203; source_row=33406 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
advanced degree professional qualification (five years post-baccalaureate experience)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision. Even using the earlier June 2000 course completion date, the evidence — principally Articles of Incorporation and vague client letters — did not demonstrate five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in business administration.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision. Even using the earlier June 2000 course completion date, the evidence — principally Articles of Incorporation and vague client letters — did not demonstrate five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in business administration.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-30_02_B5203; source_row=33409 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision, noting that the Petitioner failed to explain how her work experience relates to the proposed field and did not submit additional evidence on appeal. Additionally, even proven experience could not substitute for a baccalaureate degree or its equivalent, which the Petitioner had not demonstrated.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision, noting that the Petitioner failed to explain how her work experience relates to the proposed field and did not submit additional evidence on appeal. Additionally, even proven experience could not substitute for a baccalaureate degree or its equivalent, which the Petitioner had not demonstrated.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-29_02_B5203; source_row=33401 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although the Petitioner was the lead host, he did not show how the shows qualify as organizations or establishments under the criterion, nor that the production company has a distinguished reputation. The charity event occurred after filing and cannot establish eligibility.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the Petitioner was the lead host, he did not show how the shows qualify as organizations or establishments under the criterion, nor that the production company has a distinguished reputation. The charity event occurred after filing and cannot establish eligibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-29_01_B2203; source_row=33395 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record does not show that the Telenedelya or Cosmopolitan-Ukraine awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, and the five reality-show awards were received by the show, not the Petitioner personally.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record does not show that the Telenedelya or Cosmopolitan-Ukraine awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, and the five reality-show awards were received by the show, not the Petitioner personally.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-29_01_B2203; source_row=33391 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The issue is not whether the Petitioner contributed in some manner, but whether his original artistic contributions are of major significance in the field of entertainment, and the motion provides no new evidence overcoming the prior conclusions.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The issue is not whether the Petitioner contributed in some manner, but whether his original artistic contributions are of major significance in the field of entertainment, and the motion provides no new evidence overcoming the prior conclusions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-29_01_B2203; source_row=33394 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Many of the articles were interviews unrelated to his work in the field (covering topics like the kind of girls he likes or his preferred football league), and the Petitioner did not show how the publications' circulation compares to others.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Many of the articles were interviews unrelated to his work in the field (covering topics like the kind of girls he likes or his preferred football league), and the Petitioner did not show how the publications' circulation compares to others.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-29_01_B2203; source_row=33392 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c