Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 7491–7500
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The reference letters focused on the Petitioner's past activities as an attorney and employer rather than the prospective national importance of her proposed human resources consulting business. The BLS occupational health data did not demonstrate how the Petitioner's specific business would have broader implications beyond its direct clients.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The reference letters focused on the Petitioner's past activities as an attorney and employer rather than the prospective national importance of her proposed human resources consulting business. The BLS occupational health data did not demonstrate how the Petitioner's specific business would have broader implications beyond its direct clients.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-29_01_B5203; source_row=33398 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO did not reach the second prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong of Dhanasar, making a determination on prong 2 unnecessary.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach the second prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong of Dhanasar, making a determination on prong 2 unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-29_01_B5203; source_row=33399 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the proposed endeavor lacks national importance. The initial business plan's material internal inconsistencies reduced its probative value, and the new business plan on appeal cannot cure deficiencies because it postdates filing and presents materially changed facts. Generalized industry articles and arguments about not adversely affecting U.S. workers are immaterial to national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the proposed endeavor lacks national importance. The initial business plan's material internal inconsistencies reduced its probative value, and the new business plan on appeal cannot cure deficiencies because it postdates filing and presents materially changed facts. Generalized industry articles and arguments about not adversely affecting U.S. workers are immaterial to national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-28_02_B5203; source_row=33378 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the proposed endeavor was locally focused on the Virginia/Hopewell area serving Latin-American immigrants, with insufficient evidence of national-level impact. The advisory letter conflicted with the Petitioner's own description of her endeavor, job creation estimates were inconsistent and unsupported, and general industry statistics do not establish national importance for one individual's work.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the proposed endeavor was locally focused on the Virginia/Hopewell area serving Latin-American immigrants, with insufficient evidence of national-level impact. The advisory letter conflicted with the Petitioner's own description of her endeavor, job creation estimates were inconsistent and unsupported, and general industry statistics do not establish national importance for one individual's work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-28_03_B5203; source_row=33381 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's business plan lacked sufficient corroborating evidence to support claims of broad economic and societal benefits; the financial projections (15 jobs, $3.78M wages over five years) did not rise to national importance; the expert opinion focused on financial managers generally rather than on the Petitioner's specific endeavor's prospective impact; and the industry reports addressed the finance…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's business plan lacked sufficient corroborating evidence to support claims of broad economic and societal benefits; the financial projections (15 jobs, $3.78M wages over five years) did not rise to national importance; the expert opinion focused on financial managers generally rather than on the Petitioner's specific endeavor's prospective impact; and the industry reports addressed the finance sector broadly rather than the Petitioner's specific consulting business.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-28_08_B5203; source_row=33388 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1Aprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
Motion to Reopen – New Facts
Why AAO was not persuaded
The new evidence relates to employment acquired after the petition was filed in June 2021 and cannot demonstrate that the criterion was satisfied at the time of filing. Post-petition facts cannot establish eligibility under USCIS regulations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The new evidence relates to employment acquired after the petition was filed in June 2021 and cannot demonstrate that the criterion was satisfied at the time of filing. Post-petition facts cannot establish eligibility under USCIS regulations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-28_01_B2203; source_row=33373 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1Aprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
Motion to Reconsider – Error of Law or Policy
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's statement contains no reference to AAO's prior decision and does not identify any specific legal or policy error. Broadly disagreeing with conclusions or repeating prior arguments does not satisfy the requirements of a motion to reconsider.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's statement contains no reference to AAO's prior decision and does not identify any specific legal or policy error. Broadly disagreeing with conclusions or repeating prior arguments does not satisfy the requirements of a motion to reconsider.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-28_01_B2203; source_row=33374 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c