Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 7581–7590

EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Major award

one-time achievement (major, internationally recognized award)

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found contemporaneous newspaper articles supported that the Petitioner won the 2014 muay thai tournament, but the record lacked evidence that this award has the international stature of a Nobel-level recognition.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found contemporaneous newspaper articles supported that the Petitioner won the 2014 muay thai tournament, but the record lacked evidence that this award has the international stature of a Nobel-level recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-16_02_B2203; source_row=33250
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO acknowledged the cited regulation regarding training/experience evidence did not strictly apply but found the letters still lacked substantive membership criteria, parroted regulatory language, and did not show TMF requires outstanding achievements. The claim of national team membership was unsupported.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO acknowledged the cited regulation regarding training/experience evidence did not strictly apply but found the letters still lacked substantive membership criteria, parroted regulatory language, and did not show TMF requires outstanding achievements. The claim of national team membership was unsupported.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-16_02_B2203; source_row=33252
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

Even crediting the 2014 award, the record lacked supporting documentation regarding its stature, and the other medals/trophies lacked English translations and explanations.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Even crediting the 2014 award, the record lacked supporting documentation regarding its stature, and the other medals/trophies lacked English translations and explanations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-16_02_B2203; source_row=33251
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO conducted an aggregate review and concluded the record does not show sustained national or international acclaim or top-of-field standing.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO conducted an aggregate review and concluded the record does not show sustained national or international acclaim or top-of-field standing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-16_02_B2203; source_row=33255
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the NPU letters had suspicious similarity suggesting the Petitioner as source, undermining their probative value. The letters also contained internal inconsistencies (e.g., 'given each year' vs. biennial award, misnamed award).…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the NPU letters had suspicious similarity suggesting the Petitioner as source, undermining their probative value. The letters also contained internal inconsistencies (e.g., 'given each year' vs. biennial award, misnamed award). The statement from the issuing organization was insufficient to show broader national recognition outside that organization, and the record lacked contemporaneous evidence of national or international recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-16_01_B2203; source_row=33237
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high salary or significantly high remuneration

Why AAO was not persuaded

The salary letters did not specify her duties as a media advisor, making comparison to journalist salaries unreliable. Even if her journalist/editor salary were established, the record only showed minimum wages, not the full salary range, making it impossible to show she commanded a high salary relative to others in the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The salary letters did not specify her duties as a media advisor, making comparison to journalist salaries unreliable. Even if her journalist/editor salary were established, the record only showed minimum wages, not the full salary range, making it impossible to show she commanded a high salary relative to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-16_01_B2203; source_row=33242
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner did not elaborate on the requirements or process for election as a central representative in FNJ, or point to evidence that central representatives must have outstanding achievements. She also did not argue error in the Director's finding on NPU membership.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not elaborate on the requirements or process for election as a central representative in FNJ, or point to evidence that central representatives must have outstanding achievements. She also did not argue error in the Director's finding on NPU membership.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-16_01_B2203; source_row=33238
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media

Why AAO was not persuaded

Articles the Petitioner wrote are her work product and not about her; she is mentioned only as author or co-author. Articles in other publications about her lacked author information and were not shown to be published in qualifying media. AAO noted that articles need not focus solely on a petitioner but must include substantial discussion of the petitioner's work.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Articles the Petitioner wrote are her work product and not about her; she is mentioned only as author or co-author. Articles in other publications about her lacked author information and were not shown to be published in qualifying media. AAO noted that articles need not focus solely on a petitioner but must include substantial discussion of the petitioner's work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-16_01_B2203; source_row=33239
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Commercial successNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Commercial success

commercial successes in the performing arts

Why AAO was not persuaded

This criterion applies specifically to the performing arts; the Petitioner's work as a journalist, editor, and media consultant is not in the performing arts, and she does not meet the plain language of the criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
This criterion applies specifically to the performing arts; the Petitioner's work as a journalist, editor, and media consultant is not in the performing arts, and she does not meet the plain language of the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-16_01_B2203; source_row=33243
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to establish national importance. The projected job creation and business footprint were insufficient to demonstrate significant or substantial economic impact as required by Dhanasar.…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to establish national importance. The projected job creation and business footprint were insufficient to demonstrate significant or substantial economic impact as required by Dhanasar. The Petitioner cited statistics and facts without adequately explaining their relevance to her specific proposed endeavor, and did not show how her pricing/revenue optimization work would affect the industry more broadly.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-08-16_02_B5203; source_row=33256
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment